The debate for decision to live in either urban cities or rular areas has become more common in recent years. Some people argues that life in developed areas provide personal and career growths, while others choose to live in rural areas for better quality of life. In my view, living in big city may provide individuals better personal life, but rural areas provides overall well-balanced life.
On the one hand, people decide to spend their life in big cities for improving personal and financial aspects of life. Big city habitants has access to more option to build careers compare to undeveloped areas. Furthermore, availibility of proper amenities and facilities helps to improve personal life. These developed areas are prioritized to getting new technology and allocating more funds to make residents life better.
On the other hand, people who decides to spend their life in rural areas have a better quality of life. In generally, population is significantly low in villages than city areas which leads to less traffic, and eventually pollution. In addition, the house are cheap and have more green land. Reseach shows that residents in villages has 15% longer lifespan, and are more prone to getting ill. Life in these rural areas are overall healthier and longer.
In my opinion, Big and developed cities has access to more career options , facilies, and government’s financial allocation; whereas rural life is simple and affordable, but healthier compared to counterparts.
In conclusion, Although living in huge cities provide many personal benefits, the quality of life in rural areas are much better. Deciding to whether live in crowded, urban place or enjoy peaceful life in rural areas is depends on more numerous factors.