People believe that the government ought to be responsible for financial aid after retirement, whilst other think that they should make provision for themselves. If there is no assist from authority, it can cause a hard work in a country. However, if there is financial support from government, it is equal. In my opinion, i agree with first idea of the statement, considering that it is basic human rights.
On the one hand, if there is no help from authority after retirement. It can create hard work in a country, which can benefit the economy of a country. Moreover, this encourages people to begin thinking about their future. For instance, the USA or Canada with the hard work and great economies. However, hardworking never means being wealthy after retirement, and there are some countries in a poverty, without financial assistance for retired citizens, making this idea insecure.
On the other hand, people start working for government from young ages, putting authority into debt. However, country provide free help in many ways to be even. For example, there many countries, where the blooming is going without exhausting their civils. Another argument to this idea, that the financial help is a basic human right, making every country obey this rule. The negative factor is only that, it not every time enough.
In conclusion, although people believe that they should make their provision by themselves before retirement. It is not good idea, to decline help from a government. Being in an equal, and have same attitude from nation is better from my viewport.