Some individuals deem that the go-to solution to ease crime rate is stricter penalties. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this notion and I shall set out to explain the evidence in the following essay.
Undeniably, there are many countries worldwide where criminal activities persist, offenses such as robbery, fraud, hostage-taking, and murder. These crimes have an enormous negative impact on society. Consequently, the government has considered stringent punishment as the best solution to address this matter. Indeed, it is partly able to tackle the higher likelihood of crime, but it is not a way for long term nature. In other words, it does not guarantee that the root of this issue is completely eradicated. Thus, it is clear from observation that it is only a temporary method to deter some from engaging in criminal actions. Thereby, they still have a chance to repeat the guilty behavior and even it is more delicate. Besides, there are many cases that offenders utilize bribery to get away with the punishment. For instance, money can be used as a way to support whoever violates traffic safety or the law from punishment by graft.
Furthermore, it is clear that establishing stricter retribution is strongly affecting social safety. It is simply that coining the awareness of activities is limited, ultimately leading to citizens not respecting the law. Hence, should people not trust or concern about the rule, not only will it increase crime rate but it can also communicate a deviant sense of their behavior seriously. Concurrently, strict punishment makes people also look down on legislation significantly. The other reason is that it still has the risk of a wrong penalty. It is simply that enforcement may punish citizens while they don’t make any mistake. For example, should people be examined by traffic police after they drink fruit juice, they still be punished for having the alcohol content. Because according to scientists, almost all fruit juices also house a little alcohol concentration.
From this evidence, it is my personal conviction that stricter consequences are not a reasonable solution to address this matter. Undoubtedly, we should have innovations in the method to manage crime effectively.