As we approach a world of changing social norms and individual dynamics, the question of whether people should study overseas or whether they should study in their home country. While there are clear benefits to studying in their home country, I firmly believe that studying abroad is beneficial.
Proponents of studying in hometown cite various reasons to support their stance. When young individuals study in their own country they tend to follow a structured lifestyle and perform repetitive tasks, which makes it increasingly difficult to become resilient in the face of adversity or discomfort coupled with resourceful emergency situation1, thereby making it harder for them to deal with unexpected changes in plans without panic. Given these circumstances, it comes as no surprise that their lives may become monotonous because of their repetitive tasks and sedentary lifestyle.
Despite these arguments, I strongly maintain that studying abroad is more beneficial than studying in their home country. If young people decide to study abroad, they step out of their comfort zones and explore new environment, which encourage them to pay taxes and make ends meet. As a result of, they can confront serious challenges such as navigating unreliable public transportation networks without facing traffic congestion, overcrowding, and delays during rush hours and adapt to unpredictable weather congestion, such as heavy rain, scorching hot and freezing cold. Thus they learn to adapt to changes and overcome their language barriers.
In conclusion, I believe that there are more advantages to study abroad, on both emotional and practical levels. A case in point is my home country of Uzbekistan, where many students choose to study overseas.