It is widely accepted that some people belive that the development of tourism in natural areas like the coast and forest zones of Maine, bring important economic benefits.But others disagree that it leads to environmntal deterioration and harms local communities. In my opinion, both of perspective is wanted to development Maine with tourism and safety. However, there are have many risks to do this idea.
Firstly,in the idea of develop tourism in natural parks it is good for make the place intresting, But some tourist might be trespassing to animal habitats make them panic or migrate. For example, when you walk in the Maine’s spurce forest and reach out of pathway, you might scare the bear make them prepare to fight or escape. This make habitats destruction. I think local authorities should add some rules of sign to warn tourist to careful and do not interrupt animal. This will make backpacker who loves forest secure.
Secondly, idea of disagrees about development of tourism it is good. Also if did not develop a tourism they will not develop a safety too. For instance, When local people visit the forest to get a resources back to communities,some of them will be missing or dead in the forest without any warning. This will be a problem to find a missing people or dead body, it will be interrupt animal. Authorities have to face a risk of animals attack like bear and cougar. Both of animal can kill people with muscle and jaw, Nevertheless, There are have a way to fix this situation such as, warning signs and advice videos.
In conclusion, the introduction of both of idea it is the most important in natural tourism not only in Maine. But others zone like Arizona,California,Washington or Texas can use this rules but have to camouflage the cultural and geographic. In near future, It is likely that to see both of ideas develop with safety and preserve together.