Currently,some individuals believe that public libraries should be free due to people usage as a public vital resource,while others think that there are no importance of public libraries and it is just waste of money.Although both sides have valid arguments,i am inclined towards the first opinion for certain reasons such as long-term investment,however public libraries will be worthless.
On the one hand,a possible explanation for the second argument is that being worthless of libraries.If people occur chance to use public libraries free,they will not value and even do not go to the libraries.This is because books,which is costs a lot and these phenomenon leads to easy access to them.For instance,If people search books such as Harry Potter,which is well-known and expensive in libraries and book shops will be free to use,there are no other individuals come in order to read this book.This suggest that easy access to public libraries lead to being worthless of books.However,books have to read by public,instead of just stand on the shelf.
Therefore,the first opinion is more persuasive because of long-term investment.Government can develop in any field including the quality of individuals life,transportation and economy,thanks to knowledge of next generation,which is play a key role in improvement of country.This is because educated people can help its country through invent new technology or discover news,which is considerably beneficial.To illustrate,according to the research by scientists at United Nations,75% of counties are subsiding money for knowledge of young individuals and increasing money to public libraries in order to make opportunities to them.As a result,this means that they aware educated students,which is have access to public libraries is really beneficial in development of countries.
To conclude,while this leads starting to be valuableness of libraries,i agree with first side because of long-terms investment to the improvement
