Some people claim that the state ought to look after the health and financial sides of old-aged people who are retired while others think that humans should keep extra money for their further life. This essay will discuss both sides of the given debatable topic and my own opinion also will be given.
On the one hand it is widely believed from one part of the society as the government should care about its old generations who are retired on their health and money issues. According to their opinions that is true because all people might worked for companies of the state for some exact decades and the state should reward them with pensions. Those pensions may be gathered from other employees of the government and these life cycle continues eternally. In short, neither government nor old aged people think about the hard time of the life cycle in their future.
On the other hand the other part of the state claims gathering money for either bad days or further future of the human being rather than getting money from the government or being cared about the health of that person whenever he or she gets old enough. For example, if the people start up some little businesses when they are in their adolescence. Those businesses may blossom and they may get income nevertheless I do not work anywhere. Briefly people should not obey for not only government but their closest also and should be as intelligent and smart as they can.
In conclusion, although one part of the society’s opinion is that people should work for companies and factories of the government when they are young and a little part of their salaries should be taken as a tax for their future and when get all they will be given pensions to reward their jobs, I believe that people ought to be clever and should plan their own future not depending to anyone but their own minds.