Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public places should be banned, while others argue that people should be free to use their phones as they wish. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A large number of individuals believe that outdoor utilization of mobile phones should not be allowed; however, others argue that there must be freedom to use mobiles, according to their will. In my view, the latter perspective has significant benefits, including online education on mobile and urgent communication in need. This essay will examine both the viewpoints before concluding in favor of latter.
There are several incidents of mobile snatching in public areas and its instances are upsurging everyday; as a result, the terror among the people are increasing. Furthermore, mobile phones are getting stolen in malls and trains due to individuals negligence. Undoubtedly, therefore, people think that use of mobile phones in outdoor locations should be banned.
In contrast, there are numerous advantages of using mobile phone in public areas. Firstly, the mobile phones provide convenience of getting educated through online mode from any location. For example, when students are traveling in train, bus, or in the public park, they can study through mobile and save their precious time. Moreover, when the people need to communicate early as possible, mobile phone stands out as the gold standard, For instance, when a person met with any sort of road traffic accident, mobile phone can help in calling ambulance quickly. As a result, mobile phones can save life of people.
In conclusion, this essay thoroughly examined both the viewpoints in depth and highlights invaluable merits of latter, and proves why considering it, results quite useful. The national authorities and policymakers should conduct further research to enhance practical experience of using mobile phones from any place.