In recent years, providing help, support, and charity has become a widely discussed issue. While some people believe that supporting the locals directly improves the rate of success, and leads to a better relationship. Others argue that giving money to national and international charitable organizations can be more beneficial for those who need real support. This essay will discuss both views before giving my opinion.
On the one hand, helping and supporting the local community directly can have several positive effects on their lives. Firstly, it’s motivating for the people cause of seeing clearly where their money is being used. Secondly, it helps improve the bonds between the one who gives the money and the one who receives it, especially for neighborhoods. Also, the problems of the community can be solved, for instance. A large number of people think everyone should give money directly to the locals, so that they can get help immediately.
On the other hand, giving money to national and international organization who collects charity and distribute it to the poor community is extremely important, as a result, poor people from different countries can receive support. In addition, big organizations can help a large group of poor people. Moreover, those organizations create jobs for locals around the organization’s company office. It also encourages international cooperation.
In conclusion, although both sides have their own advantages, they play vital roles in people’s lives. While support directly to the local community motivates individuals, support to national and international organizations can improve relationships and teamwork between the two different states. Therefore, a balance between the two is the most beneficial approach in my opinion.
