The ongoing debate regarding whether to directly provide bare necessities for many individuals in need or attend in many charitable campaigns of celebrities with proponents highlighting their benefits and opponents expressing serious concerns. In this essay, I shall outline the merits and downsides associated with this issue.
In an age characterized by significant technological advancements, charity is ubiquitous, which can contribute to the improvement of some individuals in poor conditions. There is an encouragement for individuals to directly supply the assistance for those in need because when people visit impoverished individuals, they can have opportunities to witness the difficult scenarios. As a result, they can sympathise with them and utilize financial resources to provide bare necessities to meet their demands in daily life. On a yearly basis, some organisations, for instance, open more doors for students to directly experience and witness the impoverished life, which helps them widen their horizons about the poverty in their nations to make efforts to dedicate to enhancing the quality of various aspects of daily life. Therefore, it is beneficial for people to directly support those in need.
On the other hand, there is a counterargument that many individuals shouldbring their financial resources to charitable campaigns or organisations which is launched by many established figures. Because they are bake to build houses or shelters for many poor people, especially the homelessness. For instance, in Covid 19 pandemic, many individuals are willing to assist each other to overcome challenges by participating in some organisations launched by calebrities or many reputated individuals can amass others’ monetary resources to help miserable people during Yagi storm. Therefore, it is justifiablefor individuals to give money to many celebrities.
In conclusion, it seems that while directly supporting people in need may open more doors for helpers to explore their miserable life, I would contend that the benefits associated with this practice outweighed giving money to organisations. One should therefore weigh up the pros and cons and consider their priorities when deliberating which is the most optimal approach to help impoverished individuals.