The debate over whether investment preferences should center on health care or other proper realms is a contentious one. While some stakeholders drastically oppose allocating a great amount of national purse to medical service as the first priority, I firmly believe it is a worthwhile path.
Admittedly, taxpayers could be benefited by promoting some of other essential sectors such as industry and infrastructure. It is obvious that industry is the head of the economy as it yields lucrative opportunities. This can be seen in the case of Vietnam which used to be an agricultural – based economy country, has experienced a shift to industrial finance, thereby quickly mitigating the economic hardship from a conflict-torn country. Furthermore, raising fund on infrastructure over the rest would end up with the public’s gratification. According to the study of Sampthamton University, 70% of the Thailand inhabitants expressed their discontent regarding the provided life amenities; therefore, advancing these facilities could satisfy their soaring need.
On the other hand, others, myself included, prioritize the health condition of the dwellers. Initially, more concern on physical state means the overall well-being would be improved, exerting a more pronounced implication on the financial status. For instance, thanks to the top-qualified medical equipment, both lifespan and economic growth of Japanese are going on a surge. Hence, medical preferences emerges as the predominant force driving the economy and other fields. Consequently, if the government showed an indifferent attitude to health care problems, other aspects would not work efficiently.
In a nutshell, although both the 2 points of views are justified for their own reason, medical advancements should be given the precedence due to the fundamental role it plays.