In the current day, opinions are divided as to whether students need to pay full their concentration on the curriculum or whether other pursuits still play a pivotal role in learners’ schedules until they graduate. While this proposal is valid to some extent the reasons behind this thinking, I would argue that the former view is more persuasive.
Granted, it is understandable why many pupils tend to study the whole time. The key rationale behind this is future academic endeavors. By having more time to access a vast repository of knowledge thereby earning decent study achievements. Those with degrees attained by a deep focus on studying would generate wider tertiary education options. Another justification is that devoting ample time to learning can lay the foundation for adapting with bulk knowledge of higher education. For example, mastering the basics of the subject is crucial for comprehending advanced topics in areas such as mathematics or science.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned benefits of becoming full-time students, I firmly believe that it would be imprudent for learners to downplay the importance of adding extracurricular activities. First and foremost, participating in various activities outside of academics promotes physical well-being and contributes to overall mental health. Engaging in sports, clubs, or social events can prevent pupils from health issues. If learners spend most time sitting behind the table for long hours cramming lessons, it can lead to illness and obesity. Secondly, involvement in non-academic pursuits enables students to develop vital real-life skills and interpersonal competencies. Skills like communication, teamwork, or leadership are best honed through practical experiences rather than solely through academic study.
To conclude, while there are some justifications against full-time studying, I take the view that a balanced approach between other activities and study is more conducive to the overall development of young individuals.