The issue of whether globalization has become a topic of debate in recent year. Some individuals argue that it is more beneficial and others feel that it has disadvantages for native civilization. In my opinion there are both goods and downsides; However, I completely agree with the idea that internationalism is welfare for societies.
One reason why I believe internationalism appear to be beneficial to community is that cultures become richer as they come in to contact with each other. For instance, communication with foreigners makes us familiar with their manners, habits and customs. This suggest that, it provide future which is descendants of mentally and capitalic poor countries with the chance to develop economically through infusions of foreign capital and technology. Although, globalization is free trading that is reduce barriers such as tariffs and subsidies which promotes global economic growth, creates jobs and lower prices for consumers.
On the other hand, some people argue that globalization may have negative socio-cultural impacts by which society can lead to feelings of anxiety, depression, and isolation. However, I do not believe that this argument is flawed because less developed countries become depend on the superior nations due to more countries which is technologically advanced are able to sell their products to less advanced countries. Also, local businesses have suffered a lot due to globalization. For example, highly spatialized and efficient multi¬-national companies take advantage of large-scale production and sell products at rock-bottom price, so local industries could not compete with their global counterpart and go out of business. There everything requires experiment, so some fails is remissible.
In conclusion, globalization has made the rich richer while making the poor poorer. Nevertheless, I totally agree with the idea that it serviceable for civilization.