The widespread popularity of technological devices, particularly phones, has led some individuals to claim that regulations on the usage of such gadgets in public spaces should be implemented. Although I strongly believe that measures ought to be taken to minimise technological disturbance to people, totally banning mobile phones would be excessively restrictive and could potentially lead to public outrage.
To some extent, imposing a ban on mobile phones in public places is justified since such a course of action can significantly improve the overall experience of citizens. To elaborate, many library visitors, for instance, frequently leave complaints about other people’s behaviour as they may speak too loudly on calls or watch videos without headphones. When there are restrictions on mobile phone usage, though, the visitors will become more conscious of their surroundings and considerate of other individuals, ultimately increasing visitors’ satisfaction and reducing unnecessary stress.
On the other end of the coin, the possibility of unexpected circumstances or emergencies should not be neglected. In certain situations, individuals may have to use their mobile phones to call emergency services or seek assistance if in danger. Enforcing the ban would make them unable to do any of the aforementioned actions and, in turn, risk their safety. Instead, governments should pay attention to enacting other rules that take everyone’s opinions into account. For example, they can invest in marketing to raise awareness about not disturbing visitors to public spaces, including passengers, library and store customers.
In conclusion, I strongly support the idea of prioritising human comfort, but it should not come at the expense of human safety and their necessities by imposing restrictions on mobile phone usage. Instead, more effective ways should be introduced in order to avoid unnecessary complications.