A number of experts claim that organizations must provide a range of facilities for their staffs, including sport facilities. On the contrary, others believe that the onus of physical health is on employees, not on the company. This essay aims to discuss this controversy. I, side with the first idea.
previous researches have shown that employee’s physical and psychological health has a significant impact on their well- being and productivity. Regular exercise ensures individuals overal health. Those employees who exercise regularly are less susceptile to disease. Consequently, the provision of sport amenities contributes to healther staffs. Healther individuals have more energy to engage in career tasks. Therefore, in long term, organization’s productility increase.
In the organizational behavior literature, any extra facilities in order to develope individuals health act as an incentives that maintain employee’s commitment. Loyal stuffs are more effecient employees.
In the contrary, the opponant claim that it’s a person’s responsibility to engage in sport activities, not a company’s problem. Furthermore, the enormous expenditures on sport facilities, foster opponants disagreements. They clam that money can divert to crusial aspects such as lunching a new product, salary increase, and extra time off. In particular, small business can not afford these expenses.
In conclusion, despite the disagreements around rovision of sport facilities, in order to maintain sustainable performance whithin an organization and ensure employees wellbeing, businesses must spend on money encouraging exercise. moreover, small business can allocate bonus for stuffs to utilize public sport amenities.