For decades, museums and galleries have been widely adopted by nearly every nation to preserve and exhibit their respective cultural values and histories. Yet, there is a debate as to whether or not museums should focus primarily on local culture or from all around the world. Personally, I believe that conventional museums should highlight the cultural aspects and artworks of the country, although the presence of separate museums containing items from other nations does not undermine the sense of national pride.
Educating citizens about the history and culture of a country is one of the key reasons we maintain museums in the first place. They collect major cultural relics, artifacts, work of art and other art forms to reflect our past and to assist historians in their research. Rather than exhibiting internationally recognised artworks or sculptures, these museums, which largely represent our culture should feature items of which we as a nation may be proud of. For instance, many European national museums are devoted only to preserving artifacts and artworks from that country and therefore able to draw a massive of visitors from all over the world.
However, the concept of the museums in the modern era has altered substantially. We now have aviation museums, war memorials, automobile museums, computer museums , archeology museums, etc. International collections are required to make this type of museum attractive and functional. In Australia, for example, there is a museum dedicated to automobiles from over 20 countries, and the exhibits there are ideal for the purpose intended. Museums with foreign collections frequently attract tourists and serve as a fantastic method to promote tourism.
In conclusion, it is the responsibility of national and traditional museums to foster national history , although we also require museums with worldwide collections to make them more functional ad renowned. The emergence of one category does not deter the relevance of any other.