Exhibitions and museums are places, which promote a sense of national identity to the public, giving them historical heritage. Therefore, individuals regard that art galleries should focus on their national artefacts than giving attention to global world of art. Despite, I find it hard to agree with viewpoint as importance of international projects similarly beneficial.
The places which retain historical reminders are resources to value history of the country. Recognizing cultural heritages, personalities broaden their horizons, especially, when they get to know the culture of other nationalities. In case of, arts and exhibitions from other parts of the world will displayed, it could be allowed residents to understand multiculturalism. As a result, people will have other knowledge about the world, attempting to evolve.
Furthermore, many museums develop people from the educational side. Since, the aim of art galleries is give a knowledge about historical works of art, which is implemented to educational program at schools in many countries. For instance, in the NIS school in Uralsk, in the lesson of world history, students study the program of the Renaissance, where they learn about the wonderful arts of Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and Rafael Santi. Their works at the exhibition at the famous Louvre museum of France, what tells about the significance of global works of art to the public.
To sum up, I am totally opposed to the fact that local heritages are more vital than international ones, because they both benefit society. Thus supporting to get educational and multinational knowledge