Some people argue that the essential way of decreasing crime is to raise number of police around the streets. while Others believe there are many paths to reduce crime and these would be more impactable. This essay considers both of them and will provide the justification.
Firstly, Advocate increasing the number of of plice officers is the one way of to handle the crime and set back to prisior who could do crime and in that its more effective that when crime is happend it easy to call police and it helped them in just few seconds. More officers means less crime but depends own the officers some time officers shake hand with crimeniors and provide all information of places that criminals easily perform dirty game and ran away. For example, An international Organization conduct a survey in pakistan for checking and identify the credibility of officers how involves in crime, Moreover after 6 month survey released our report with mentioned 68percent officers involving with crime partner and help out to perform these activities.
Secondly, I get into the other paths that will be followed and the result would be better than the above argued. Some countries create different forces to treat only criminals and provide all necessary items to special forces who will be responsible all citizens even the foreign citizen. However, To tackling the crime other paths will be well formed such as standing up well known officers, provide full training like how to talk people, give full access of handling locations and having devices which is essential for controlling Crimes. Crime is the main key in any society that will generate hate and less cope between citizens.
In a nutshell, I firmly agree with both views on handling crimes is a more sustainable solution for the future to control criminal activities and develop good societies for future generations.