Many individuals argue that kids under the age of 12 should be illegal to own mobile phone, while others think that phones are a beneficial devices for children of all ages. I strongly agree that although phones keep parents in contact with their children while they are outside, I believe that children with mobiles can discover things they should not know it in this age.
On one hand, it is argued that mobiles are essential for who are under 12 because mobiles allow parents to call their kids while they out. On another words, phones are important tool for young ages, because it allow them to call their parents if any issue happen to them, so parents can go and help them diractly, and if parents cannot come, at least they will guid them to the right action. For example, nowadays, parents are more confident to send there kids any place due to phones, which keep them in contact. However, I belive children under the age of 12 must not go alone because phones cannot protect them in all situations, so phones are not important in this age.
On the other hand, others believe that phones expose children who under 12 to things are oldre than them. This is because, phones are making children easy victims for crimenal, which is widespread phenomenon these days. Crimenal can ask kids to record an unbehavior video to their body or even to meet them and kids are not aware about the consequences. For instance, a significant number of crimes related to kids happened by phones. I agree with this side because banning phones will protect kids from these types of crime, which are happence by mobile phones.
In conclusion, owning mobiles are allowing kids under 12 to call their parents any time; however, it makes children pice of cake for crimenal.