In this present era, there is an ongoing debate regarding the financial budget spent for cultural activities. While some argue that it is essential for authorities to invest an increasing amount of resources to support music, theater or art, others suppose it as a waste. This essay will discuss both views, along with my agreement with this former standpoint.
On the one hand, some oppose the investment into cultural programs since it is believed that there are several urgent issues needed to confront. For instance, in mountainous and remote regions, the deficiency of electricity and basic facilities like schools or hospitals may adversely affect residents’ lives. Therefore, a huge amount of money should be allocated to upgrade infrastructure, rather than organizing musical events.
However, I firmly believe that administrators should budget for these activities for two main reasons. Firstly, it is indisputable that recreational and cultural activities play such a significant role in society. For example, watching movies or attending musical fairs can relieve stress after working hard all day. This, as a result, contributes to the better well-being of the population.
Furthermore, cultural events help to preserve national identity. In other words, in the globalization era when cultural interference occurs, holding such kinds of activities offers accurate awareness about the value of conventional festivals and practice, along with a nation’s history. Future generations, hence, will enhance their patriotism to avoid the opposition from any hostile enemies who take advantage of cultural affairs to trigger societal instability.
In conclusion, while some contend that funding cultural activities is a waste, I firmly restate that it is vital for authorities to allocate sufficient budget for these events on account of the overall health of residents and national identity conservation.