Whether school children with little artistic talent should be dictated to learn arts-based subjects or they should focus more on the ones that fit their capability better is a topic of intense debate. While I agree that students need to spend more time on subjects that are useful for their future career in a few aspects, I would argue that learning art classes can bring about significant merits.
On the one hand, there are valid reasons why I believe that forcing children with little artistic aptitude into art classes is counterproductive. Regarding mental health, without having to attend mandatory yet uncomfortable classes, students can enjoy a less frustrated and pressured school time. Otherwise, they may struggle to produce artwork if they possess little to no talent, which can make them feel daunted and embarrassed, resulting in an increase in the risk of anxiety and depression. Another point that is worth considering is that concentrating on practical subjects can help students, especially those who choose major requiring lengthy training, to have a brighter career prospect. Learners wishing to major in computer science or medicine, for example, can spend more time on acquiring specialized knowledge and accumulating hands-on experience if they are not required to study drawing or painting. Consequently, from a purely vocational perspective, prioritizing practical training over technical art education appears logical
On the other hand, I maintain that mandatory art classes offer essential cognitive and developmental benefits for all children, regardless of their natural talent. From educational perspective, primary and secondary students should attend art classes as they should focus on holistic development instead of being trained for jobs at an early age. Moreover, drawing and painting can train students’ brain in observation, spatial awareness, and creative problem-solving skills. This is because art education is not about creatig masterpieces but learning to observe details, which can help students develop non-linear thinking that is transferable to science, mathematics, and literature. Another major reason is that when art sessions prioritise self-expression over rigid technical evaluation, they serve as a vital mental break from heavy theoretical subjects, thereby, reducing overall study fatigue. Therefore, art education remains an indispensable component of a balanced school curriculum that supports holistic child development.
In conclusion, although I accept that emphasizing on practical subjects can improve student’s mental health and career opportunities, I am strongly convinced that attending art classes including drawing and painting can serve as a stress relief approach and and help them develop essential skills such as creative thinking and problem-solving skills.