Certain Individuals feel the government should finance creative people. I strongly believe they should be encouraged because they contribute to the overall success of a country.
On the one hand, people with imaginative skills can invent extraordinary art such as painting, pottery and sculptures. This leads to tourist attractions and foreign income in a place. These unique talents may result in beautifying a nation with their visionary. For instance, a Hindu temple built with sculptures or the famous singer Micheal Jackson . They make history by building, painting and singing extravagant creations and should be supported.They can help create amazing designs in clothing,jewelry and crafts. Consequently, leading to a strong and unique economy.
However, government funding cannot guarantee progress for these people. These people become success stories after trail and error and not everyone proves to be great artists or musicians. This could waste tax money and provoke ill feelings for craftsman.Unfortunately, the state’s money is very valuable because it is also used for other more important projects such as health care and education. For example, India, a poverty stricken country,would rather pay for public hospitals than a struggling musician. Therefore, taxpayers may question spending and request for serious action against providing funds to these people.
In conclusion, I agree that innovative persons must be employed and funded by the authority. This will maintain balance and achieve great success in a community.