Nowadays, the cost of health care and education is increasing year by year. This issue has been a topic of significant debate across the globe, where some see it as the responsibility of each individual, while others argue that the government should fund these services. This essay will discuss both views before explaining why I think the state should bear the essential financial responsibility.
Those who oppose government support mainly point to two arguments. Firstly, public services require high taxation, which reduces people’s income and may discourage investment. Secondly, government-run institutions are often inefficient, unlike private schools and hospitals, which prioritize quality in order to compete for customers. From this perspective, it may seem reasonable for people to take responsibility for their own needs.
On the other hand, supporters argue that the state funding is far more beneficial. Health care and education are as important for both the country and its people. If everything were left entirely to individuals, people with low incomes could be unable to afford treatment or schooling, thus widening inequality across generations. Moreover, society as a whole benefits from a healthy and educated population, as this leads to lower crime rates, higher productivity and economic prosperity. In my opinion, government should not necessarily provide every service itself, but rather ensure that essential care and basic schooling remain free for everyone.
In conclusion, although the arguments about cost and efficiency deserve consideration, I believe that the government should predominantly be responsible for medical care and education, as this guarantees fair access and fosters social harmony in the long run.