It is argued that investing in education and healthcare is a necessity for governments, whereas others believe that it is not the authorities’ duty. Although both views hold merits, I agree more with the former perspective for certain reasons elaborated in this essay.
Admittedly, the excessive investment in both education and healthcare systems creates a significant burden on the national budget, which may take away resources that would otherwise be allocated to other important aspects of a country. This not only increases welfare dependence among the population but also creates an uneven budget for developing the whole nation in the long run. However, this view seems unconvincing due to the fact that it is the responsibility of governments to allocate their state funds properly to ensure the country’s enhancement. As a result, education and healthcare may be prioritised over other fields, but they cannot influence or negatively affect the development of a whole economy.
From my perspective, heavy investment in educational and welfare systems is a crucial step for the authorities, which fosters a more well-rounded society. Knowledge and health play a significant role in people’s lives; without these two qualities, individuals cannot contribute to the national economy or simply work and study for personal development. This, in the long run, may become a pressure for the country if not solved effectively by allocating more budget to education and health aspects. Thus, if education and health are the main priorities, governments can create a better and higher-quality workforce, generating a huge economic benefit for their home countries when competing with other nations.
In conclusion, while some people fear that investing in education and health is a waste of national funding, I firmly believe that this shift’s advantages, regarding a more qualified workforce and better competitive opportunities, are more pronounced.