In recent years, there has been significant debate surrounding the issue of whether pupils at education institutions study more effectively with instructors than other sources, namely internet and TV. In my point of view, I completely disagree with the view that the internet and television are pointless for students’ comprehensive development.
To begin with, I assume that the internet and television can teach students more lessons than teachers via their enormous data, even information that is not included in textbooks. In other words, while most teachers convey knowledge in a certain curriculum, other sources can communicate unlimited insights, even intensive and enhanced knowledge. A prime example of this is English lessons, in which teachers frequently discuss grammar and vocabulary, whilst sources such as the internet and TV can convey native cultures and diverse styles of pronunciation.
Furthermore, I think pupils can learn through the internet and TV more conveniently. That is to say, they can conduct research on the internet anywhere and turn on TV any time they have the desire, whereas they can exclusively meet and ask their tutors at a certain time in the schedule of their schools..For instance, excellent pupils having numerous questions to finish their assignments of the university can use the internet to search for their comprehensive answers in lieu of waiting until the next day to ask their teachers in a limited timeframe.
In conclusion, while some advocate for teachers who are the optimal choice for teaching students, I am more inclined to the view that other sources such as the internet and television can communicate insights to pupils more effectively. I believe that parents and governments should collaborate to facilitate for students to learn by themselves via the internet and TV, contributing to their comprehensive evolvement.