In today’s globalization, it is argued that students should cover all expenses in terms of tuition fees as tertiary-education institutions introduce individuals to a large number of upsides rather than society. This essay attempts to unravel the two typical reasons why I totally disagree with this statement.
One such primary reason is that if student financial aid is provided annually, the governments are more likely to give students more access to lots of career opportunities. As a result, they can ensure to have a 9-to-5 job after graduation, leading to the lower risk of unemployment. Moreover, the rate of crime emerging in today’s world also lessens, since the original root of crime is lack of employment and job opportunities. Taking VietNam as an example, the higher the college enrollment is, the lower the criminal rates are.
Another compelling reason is that when students don’t pay attention to their financial burden for all fees, they will be able to engage in extracurricular activities as well as social clubs in their communities. Such meaningful projects greatly help the underprivileged. This is exemplified by most universities in my country providing their students with a great deal of voluntary activities to improve their soft skills along with hard skills and interact more with financially disadvantaged people. Therefore, if students can not access social selfware benefits to pay for the cost of their own learning, they have to spend their free time doing lots of part-time jobs to make ends meet instead of taking part in those activities.
In conclusion, the governments should cover all expenses in regard to students’ tuition fees to ensure the growth of manpower in the job market or share the fee percentages with undergraduates.