It may be true to some extent that people doing work as a group could gain more essential skills than ones doing individually. I find this argument totally groundless because these two modes should not be compared.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that working as a group can foster several important life skills. To begin with, one who engages in a group may enhance their teamwork ability as they have to learn how to work together for a common goal. As a result, each member develops a sense of responsibility and understands that their behaviour can affect others in the same team. In addition, people taking part in team activities are believed to build up self discipline since they become more aware of the importance of adhering to the rules to not ruin the whole group’s performance. For example, for a presentation to be successful, each member of the team has to be on time, meticulously prepare their parts and follow dress code, or else the team efforts would become meaningless.
On the other hand, there are some skills for life that people could gain while doing individual activities. Firstly, by learning to address arising issues by themselves, one’s problem-solving competency would probably be strengthened. This is practically the case for doing an individual writing assignment when one has to do all the tasks including making outlines, researching and proofreading all alone instead of taking charge of only one part in a team’s work. Thanks to that, people working alone are considered to become more independent and confident. Another personal skill that may be upgraded from individual activities is self-control. When monitoring the whole process, one has to remain consistently focused on the task at hand without being dragged by the urge to seek help from others.
In conclusion, I believe it is unreasonable to weigh up team and individual activities as they offer chances to develop distinctive skills for life.