currently, environmental pollution has become so ubiquitous that we can see them everywhere. While I acknowledge the increasing the cost of fuel is the effective solution, it is better than that if human explore alternative energy resources.
On the one hand, increasing fuel prices can motivate people to use public transport . Commuting cost will grow if fuel cost uplift so that the number of individuals using private vehicles crash dramatically. this way bot only make them have balance expenditure but also rise the air quality to improve health’s resident. moreover, industry relating to fossil fuel and economy can progress because of outlay from fuel cost. government can use them for project looking for alternative energy resources . for example , authorities need to enhance public awareness about the value of fuel so that they have expense and energy saved from increasing fuel prices.
on the other hand, it is not the best way, it is alert that human will cope with various environmental problems related to energy shortage in the near future since it is not an effective long-term solution. government should concentrate on discovering substitute energy or renewable energy such as wind, water , solar ,.. etc. besides, more budget should be invested for education and programs involving accumulating energy. for instance, government convey energy deficiency lead to catastrophic consequences such as human life is similar with prehistory or energy inflation can create environmental degradation and natural disaster like volcano, tsunami , earthquake,… which pose a serious threat to exist of human.
to conclude, rising fuel prices can help solve environmental problems to a degree. however, the most effective solution would be to provide a stimulus for society to intentionally reduce damaging impacts to our habitat.