In modern times, the issue of six years of unpaid education for all students is the best approach to decreasing poverty in progressive countries I Completely disagree with the idea that poverty might not be removed in countries by this strategy.
There are a number of reasons why I believe that is not the effective method is to increase literate rate also removed penurity in countries. Perhaps the main reasons why I think that it is not right solution is because lack of time. The children need free education for upper classes at least 15 year. Within six years the student just able to learn read and write, but that is not enough to improve literate rate. For example, the Germany provides free education as a result this country has succeeded in remove poverty. A further point childrens can not learn productive education as like subject-based studies, which is include intermediate level of education. Any country will be developed when rural areas children would be chance of free education at certain level and they will be literate.
In addition, particularly read and write and use numbers, those are not enough and don’t implement any job sectors, etc. The job industries they want expert peoples those who are skilled in various things. That is not possible because few years of studies, educational institute just teached basic subjects. Finally, Finally, the poor families of Children they don’t admitted upper level of colleges and universities, because higher costs. The poor Students hope goes lost at that time so that thin amount of time is not opplicable.
In conclusion, Considering the factors discussed above. I believe these developing Countries never decline poverty given Six years of free education.