There an ongoing debate regarding the idea about the only language in the world , morover, some peole believe that it is going to be English, because it is the most widspeard language around the tourists . The topic has coule of negative and postive aspects and i will proved them below .
On one hand , communication will be easier , if all individuals all over the globe speak in the only one langu. As we know, at the present the society has a huge issue in terms communication due to lack of language knowledge. The procces of learning diffirent languanges , even in order to understand other cultural people is complicated and demand a lot of time. For instance, the sciences in Britan made a research and discoverd that five thousend words are recuired to be able to speak fluently in one language and on avarage, it takes two years . However ,with one language world the relevance of that challange would be dissappeared and people wil be able to speak with everyone.
On the other hand , the individuals who are marginilizing the idea of dominant language do not relize that it can eliminate linguistic diversity . The diffirence of languages are cultural riches , uniqes of every nation . In Kazakhstan we have a proverb : the country is culture and it is impossible to make culture without language which means without language you will stop being a country.
To sum up, althoug nowadays some people are suppporting the idea of speaking in one language in order to improve the level of socialization , others are thinking that the idea will destroy cultural unique and it is not neccescerry