Many individuals argue that comapnies must manufacture items that are able to stay for a long time, while others believe that the stages should be depended on manufacturing goods that are low-cost. This essay stands with the first view because although cheap producats can be purchased easiely due to low coasts, foucasing on quality is more efficient in the long-term.
it is argued that companies should produce cheap items because most of citizens can affoard the value. The main reason is low costs items are easy to buy for most of the community layers combaired with those not; parents who have children are tend to purchase cheap toys for their kids instead of expenseive plays. As a result, with cheap prodacts, people are able to organise there budget in more effective way. For instance, in industrial countries, such as China, resdints there are able to buy a lot of items because of the low costs of them. Cheap products give the flixbility in individuals’ budgets; however, there is more efficient way to manage the budget than buying cheap items.
On the other hand, many people think that maintance high quality is more impotant than coasts in long-term. This is because high quality producats can stay for a long time not like most of cheap ptoducts. So, instead of buying 5 cheap products in 5 years, one high quality product can stay the entire preriod. Therefore, in the long terms, high quality products are cheper than cheap products and more beneficial. For example, IPhone 17 pro max can operate in a high performane for 5 to 6 years, which is imposibale for cheap smartphones. High quality is more important than the price and companies should focus on it.
In conclusion, despite the flixibilty of cheap items, in the long term, high quality products are more efficient and cheaper than cheap products.