It is suggested that the government should spend less money on the creative activity, but rather allocate more public funds to improve educational system. I strongly agree with this view as there are not many people pursuing an art degree and an improvement in education could raise students’ chances of having a well-paid job.
The federal authorities should decrease the fund on the artwork due to the low number of students enrolling in art degrees compared to other majors. This is because arts is widely perceived to be a more challenging career path, but the money earned would be less than other professionals, like doctors or engineers. Those, who oppose this, would argue that renowned artists, like Picasso or world-famous musicians, like Beethoven, can earn a fortune for their masterpieces. However, they have neglected the fact that those are exceptional individuals with talents and their success is difficult to replicate. Therefore, given the challenges in this career, not many students would embark on art career.
Additionally, allocating the public tax on education would be a better option as it contributes to an increase in students’ opportunities of getting a high-paying job. This is because educational background is of importance, so someone studying in a better environment and programs is likely to earn more than their peers. For example, undergraduates from an esteemed university, like Oxford or Harvard, are likely to be recruited and offered a higher salary compared to other applicants.
In conclusion, the higher authorities should utilize their budget on enhancing the countries’ education, not to spend more on the arts. It is because there are fewer people studying arts than other majors, and a development in education can widen the opportunities for individuals to get a job with higher pay range.