It is an indisputable fact that prevention is better than cure, which is why some claim that more money should be spent on preventing instead of curing illness. From my personal perspective, I strongly agree with this statement due to following reasons.
There exist two main culprits why I support this statement. The first and foremost one is the reduction in long-term financial burden on public health systems. To be more precise, in some countries, a surmounting amount of money and resources has been spent on finding remedies for illness, including infrastructures, labour and medical care. However, referring to terminal illnesses, for instance, cancer, have not been cured entirely by any health organisations across the world, despite cutting-edge technology. In contrast, education and prevention require more effort and time but less money with the same effectiveness. Therefore, investments will be spent on other fields, such as technology, industry and agriculture.
Additionally, enhancing health education in public serves as a crucial role in promoting better lifestyles and health conditions. Specifically, by educating the public about the value of nutrition, exercise and mental beings, governments can improve health consciousness, thus reducing the risk of other health problems, such as obesity and other diseases. Although some opponents may argue that existing conditions should take precedence, it is more effective that problems should be handled at root causes, hence preventing the potential repetition of severe diseases.
In conclusion, from my aforementioned points, I definitely support the statement that prevention should be the priority due to its financial benefits and efficiency.