Some people concur with the viewpoint, which says that majority of time and resources that is invested on maintaining wildlife ought to be spent on developing the lives of people, meanwhile others do not agree with this statement. I completely disagree with the initial sentence, mainly because human’s lives depends on the wildlife and its function.
When it comes to investing lives of humans, we have to sacrifice our nature and the consequences of this is much bigger. Especially, considering recent Earth’s pollutions, problems that humans made by themselves. For instance, by throwing rubbish everywhere, people caused global warming and with that, many types of animals are in danger, such as white bears. This means that by damaging and reducing the investment of wildlife, we will decrease our life index too.
In case of animal’s and plant’s function in our lives, we know that because of them we keep our biodiversity and ecosystem, which are totally essential for ourselves. Nevertheless, we have to consider that we are consuming their meat and skin to make own lives for a way better. Whether, we would not conserve money for them, we will get these things in even more low quality. To keep this balance, we must to think about their lives, as it is connected to human’s lives too.
To sum up, I stay on the opposite position to the sentence, primarily because saving live of nature is much more integral than the human’s lives, considering that we can not live without them. We should not overlook needs of wildlife, due to it can be ended up ruining general life level of ours.