Band 4+: The rising cost and decreasing supply of fossil fuels such as oil and gas, along with environmental concerns, means that their continued use as our main source of energy is impractical and alternative sources must be found. The only realistic alternative is nuclear energy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

In the modern times fossil fuels such as oil and gas being replaced by the nuclear energy I believe that nuclear energy is a good alternative to take fossil fuels’ place.

Fossil fuels were our energy source since very start. As a result, people got used to cost-effective fount of energy that is available widely. For example, coming to some nation that were relying on non-renewable energy and offer them nuclear energy instead, will make them concerned about safety risks and elevated price. Public perceptions should not be underestimated.

On the other hand, mankind will be obliged to avoid combustion of fossil fuels for electricity generation and avail themself of nuclear energy have less dependence on finite resources al will keep away from emissions. Therefore, nuclear energy has a potential to be a clean and safe compensation to gas and oil.

Both opinions have rights to be. However, I am convinced that nuclear energy is our future. For the reason that someday, humanity will lack of fossil fuels. And that day is closer than they think.

In conclusion, although fossil fuels are common origin of energy ,I feel that transition to nuclear energy is a natural stage of human progress.