There is a contentious argument that poorer nations should be provided with humanitarian support during disasters by rich countries. This essay agrees with this statement because it can offer considerable benefits to both nations and foster a humane society.
It is clear that supporting those in need can offer long-terms positive implications. On the one hand, the country being helped can overcome the disastrous consequences of the catastrophic period it is experiencing. On the other hand, the supporters would have their advantages in various areas. For instance, they can get into foreign markets to export and import goods, which can increase the average revenue.
Not only gaining merits but the ones who giving aid to others can also render a better world. In particular, by doing that, the goverment will become a lead model for its citizens to lend a hand in that voluntary work. Moreover, looking far beyond, it can considerably influence on more countries to learn from that act of goodness. Therefore, humanitarism is spreaded all over the world.
In conclusion, I believe that support from wealthy nations to less developed countries is necessary due to the value it will bring and the better the world will become
