Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In recent years, the increasing cost of university education, alongside uncertain job prospects for graduates, has sparked a considerable debate about the true purpose of higher education. Some people argue that universities should eliminate arts subjects, like philosophy and history, in order to focus on vocational subjects. While I acknowledge importance of such practical subjects, […]

Students take a lot of time and hardwork for earning money to pay for the tuition fee. Increasing universities fee scarce job opportunities prospects for the students who have just passed out from the university have motivate some of the people to believe colleges should not teach unnecessary subject, including arts, philosopy, history, and should […]

Recently, the unemployment rate is climbing upwards while the number of scholars of universities is rising in every gap. In this line, people discuss the problem that universities should focus on academic lessons instead of artificial subjects for preventing the potential unemployment of students. I completely agree with the statement. To introduce, the university logic […]