Part 1
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Samples
Words: 0
band 8.5
Recently, the opinion that the ability to attain safe, potable liquids at no cost is a fundamental entitlement has become increasingly common around the world. Although some may disagree, I strongly believe that this vital resource must be available worldwide to marginalized groups who can’t acquire a purified provision due to a number of factors.
First of all, individuals who have this resource provided gratis will find it very worthwhile. Due to the fact that H2O is a necessity for everyday use, it is true that not everyone can budget for it; therefore, being able to obtain treated utility without a fee is remarkably convenient, which means that citizens enjoy a superior lifestyle. For instance, segments of society with contaminant-free liquid available won’t have to worry about the expense, whereas the population that cannot financially avail themselves of it may have no such option. Hence, mankind will gain many upsides by saving their money instead of spending it on basic survival needs.
Furthermore, not everyone has the means to manage the cost of sanitized liquid, meaning a decontaminated distribution ought to be an essential liberty. As a case in point, essential fluid is what humanity needs in order to survive. Thus, without it, the body won’t be able to function.
In conclusion, even though some may argue otherwise, it is true that having a safe reserve offers a better quality of life. From my perspective, persons who want better health must agree that purified water is a basic prerequisite so that they can enjoy an enhanced quality of life.
band 7
In our society, clean water has been considered a basic human right. However, in reality, most parts of the world still do not have access to this resource. Someone might believe that it does not mean that the government isn’t responsible for a free supply or charge, but I completely disagree with this opinion. I am sure that the government must build a comfortable state for citizens, including providing clean water.
To begin with, access to a clean water is a basic human rights, be the way, in consequence, the government should provide the necessary resource as well as is possible. In other words, every individual deserves to have a free supply. Availability of necessary resources is about people’s health, and in addition, is related to hygiene. Clean water could prevent diseases, which as a result lead to population health increasing. For example, unaccess to minimal hygiene could raise risks for viruses or harmful bacteria involving.
Moreover, there are situations in third-world countries such as Afghanistan, the Central African Republic, and etc. In these areas, the population, especially children, are dying on a regular basis, which means decreasing all fields of the country, by consuming unclean water or lack of essential resources.
Overall, I strongly keep the statement of necessary water provided free of charge because it is a basic human right. It’s not even about the government’s needs; it’s also about people’s health and preventing any diseases in the future.
Access to clean water is universally recognized as a fundamental human right. Consequently, it is essential that measures are taken to ensure its availability for all individuals. However, I contend that the assertion that clean water should be provided entirely free of charge is not entirely feasible. The provision of clean water necessitates substantial investment in infrastructure and technology, which incurs significant costs. It is more pragmatic to offer complimentary access solely to financially disadvantaged individuals, while imposing fees on wealthier residents.
Moreover, it is the government’s responsibility to safeguard essential rights, including the right to clean water. Nevertheless, the logistics of distributing clean water entail considerable financial outlays, which encompass both the development of infrastructure and ongoing maintenance expenses. Granting free access to clean water for every household could jeopardize state budgets, potentially leading to fiscal instability and a strain on public resources.
That being said, it is crucial for the government to establish equitable regulations for access to clean water. For instance, individuals hailing from low-income backgrounds, particularly those in rural locales where access is limited, should be granted complimentary water supply. Conversely, wealthier residents residing in urban environments could bear the responsibility of payment, based on their monthly water consumption, thereby ensuring a fair distribution of resources.
In conclusion, while access to clean water is an undeniable necessity that must be prioritized by the state, the concept of providing it for free should be judiciously regulated. By restricting complimentary access to economically disadvantaged groups, we can uphold the principles of justice and equity for all citizens, ensuring that no one is deprived of this vital resource due to financial constraints.
When it comes to the issue of basic human rights to access clean water, a significant number of inhabitants stand with different kinds of views. While, a good number of individuals tend to take this issue as rosy, others seem to hold the opposite tend. However, I am going to outline both side of this prior to giving a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, a great number of merits comes from this affair in many ways. The first and foremost point is that I think the government in any country should supply the population with free access water because it is one of the basic human rights. In other words, every individual deserve to access a free water supply. Furthermore, clean water prevents disease and encourages proper hygiene at home. In addition, if people consume clean water regularly, it will reduce disease and promote health; as a result, it will enhance the community health and reduce government spending on treatment and medicine.
However, it also seems to be likely to come up with a couple of shortcomings. To begin with, people who live in poverty would struggle if water fees were added; it will put a lot of pressure on them. This is already the case in various countries. Moreover, Factories in many countries dump their waste water directly into rivers, making clean water polluting. Due to which it is becoming very difficult for countryside people to get fresh water; in that case, government should supply free fresh water for those community. In other cases, in many urban areas, people are seen wasting a lot of water, in which cases, the price of water should definitely be included.
To sum up, having illustrated both sides of this affair, I would like to state my opinion that I strongly agree with this statement as it comes up with a good number of merits.
BAND 8
There is no denying the fact that water is very essential for humans, and it should be easy to access. While it is a commonly held belief that access to clean water is one of the main human rights, every home should have a water supply that is offered free of charge. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this statement because it is obvious that the need for water is crucial for all living beings.
To begin with, I think governments in any country should supply the population with free access to water, because it is one of the basic human rights. In other words, every individual deserves to have a water supply for free. Clean water prevents diseases and encourages proper hygiene at home and in other places. In addition, if people consume clean water on a regular basis, it will reduce diseases and promote health; as a result, it will enhance the community’s health and reduce government spending on treatment and medicines. For example, official studies have shown that people who have access to clean water are more likely to enjoy good health and are less likely to suffer from diseases.
Another point to consider: people who live in poverty would struggle if water fees were added, which is already the case in various countries. For instance, nations in Sudan are suffering because they cannot access clean water. Therefore, more and more people there are dying either because of consuming unclean water or lacking access to water supplies.
In conclusion, I believe that every individual in the world deserves to use water as easily as possible because it is one of the simple rights for humans. Moreover, accessing clean water will prevent diseases and pollution. Governments should focus more on providing people with clean and free water.
band 7
In our society, clean water has been considered a basic human right for decades. However, the reality is that most of the world population does not have access to this essential resource. Some believe that this does not mean that the government isn’t responsible for providing a water supply free of charge, but I dare to disagree. It is of the utmost importance that all citizens should be provided a free water supply.
Firstly, having free access to water is not only a matter of individual health but also a crucial aspect of public health. For instance, in Africa, there is a plethora of countries that lack the critical infrastructure that provides water to the most remote areas of the continent. Most Africans do not have safe drinking water, or even water to shower, which makes it easier for viruses and harmful bacteria to thrive, resulting in infections and poor general health.
The second reason behind my opinion is the following: without clean water, society cannot thrive. Good quality water is essential to a basic healthy life. In a 2016 study made by the University of Cape Town, the researchers concluded that children who do not have access to a clean water source when they are 5 to 12 years old are 90% more likely to be 10 cm shorter than those who do not lack a clean and free water supply. Since the human body is made nearly 60% of water, one can claim that life is not sustainable without water.
To sum up, water is an essential resource for humans to thrive. Without water, people do not reach their full potential and many diseases can spread quickly, resulting in a decline in a country’s general wellbeing. Therefore, it is my opinion that people should be provided a free water supply.
Being able to get access to drinkable water is a basic entitlement of human. That is why all residences should be covered with water resource without any extra charge. In my point of view, water should not be completely free because humans tend to waste supplies that don’t charge any taxes. Additionally, if residents don’t pay the water taxes, there won’t be enough funds to maintain the sustainability of water purifying facilities.
Many individuals believe they have rights to get water for free from the government, but they do not realize that this can actually become a reason for wasteful behaviours to emerge and may also lead to unfortunate consequences in the future. As an example for this, during the 20 years of period the water taxes have been expectationally affordable in Uzbekistan and people used to use drinkable water for all kind of purposes including washing their vehicles, cleaning their yards or just let it flow to make the air moist on the hot days of summer, not caring about the how wasteful this is. As a result, we are deling with scarcity of clean water supplies at the moment and the taxes are becoming unimaginably expensive. In the similar way, the nature in the city itself is also suffering from drought. Therefore, the government should have charged people a bit more in order to make a balance.
However, wastefulness is not the only issue that has to be delt, but the amount of funds come from citizens to maintain the water facilities is also an imperative problem. This is because, government uses the tax funds to build or operate the special pumps that serve water to our taps and pay for the employees who are working in that area. If people pay less or get water for free, the workforce decreases because workers don’t want to their labour for a small amount of salary.
To sum up everything that has been stated so far, not charging for water supplies makes people less responsible towards it and they become more wasteful and also there won’t be anough funds for the government to keep the water cleaning facilities stable.
While some people argue that clean water is a basic human right and should be provided free of charge to every household, others believe that supplying free water to every home would be too costly for governments. I personally agree with the former, and the reasons will be elaborated on in this essay.
To begin with, it might seem reasonable for some to argue that providing free clean water to every household would place a heavy financial burden on governments. To explain it simply, this is because governments must pay for infrastructure and maintenance costs. For example, building pipelines in rural areas is difficult and expensive. In addition, water treatment plants are not the same in every region, which increases costs. Therefore, it is believed that providing free clean water to homes would be too expensive for governments.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that free access to clean water plays a crucial role in protecting people’s health. This is due to the fact that clean water helps prevent diseases and improve hygiene. For example, washing hands is an effective way to protect against bacteria, and drinking safe water helps prevent diarrhoea. As a result, providing free clean water can significantly improve public health.
In conclusion, although it is undeniable that some people believe that providing free water would be extremely costly for governments, I am of the opinion that access to clean water is a basic human right. This is because access to clean water is essential for public health and disease prevention. Therefore, I agree to a large extent that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Every citizen should have access to a free water supply because access to clean water is a basic human right.
I fully agree with the above-mentioned statement because there should not be any compromise when it comes to the question of basic human rights.
Water is essential to every human being. Humans cannot survive without water. Therefore, access to water is considered a basic human right, agreed upon by many international organizations such as UN bodies like UNHRC and UNICEF. Not only human beings but also animals are dependent on water for their survival. Therefore, many animal rights activists argue that animals also deserve free access to water.
Some people argue that if water is accessed freely, people will waste it. Their argument is partially true, though it is not strong enough to refute people’s right to access water freely. I think Government and NGOs should launch campaigns to make people aware of the misuse of water. School teachers and religious leaders should be mobilized so that they campaign for saving water, which aligns with our religious values and cultural ethos.
In conclusion, I would like to argue that if people are aware of the detrimental effects of the misuse of water, they will use water preciously even if it is accessed freely. We already know that we have limited access to Earth’s water resources because we are already witnessing the scarcity of drinking water. But this should not be an excuse to deny people’s right to free access to water if campaigns for water awareness are done efficiently.
There is no denying that being able to access pure water is a crucial human need. There is a compelling argument to provide a clean water supply to every household free of charge. I strongly support this viewpoint because a great number of residents cannot afford to pay water fees, and providing clean water will prevent health issues for society.
To begin with, in the last couple of decades, the global economy was not going well due to high inflation all around the world. For example, according to the Wall Street Magazine, inflation in the twenty-first century has dramatically reduced people’s purchasing power compared to the previous century by about 14 percent. In other words, an enormous number of families are suffering from poverty because of high inflation and the constant increase in the cost of daily needs such as food; therefore, a lot of them cannot provide an extra budget for water costs.
Another point to consider: if governments were responsible for delivering clean water to inhabitants, it would lead to preventing health issues and pandemics. It is also possible to say that a lot of developing countries’ civilians cannot reach drinkable water sources, and that is the main reason for the spread of contaminated water-related diseases, for instance, cholera and typhoid fever.
In conclusion, a free water supply is a suitable decision that all states in the world should make to help poor families and prevent dangerous diseases from infecting the community, and to provide crystal-clean water for everyone, despite the cost and the effort from the governments.
band 7.5