Part 1
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore, every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Samples
Words: 0
Band 6.0
Having water for free, could lead to multiple troubles, especially if it was for everyone. Because, it is not expensive, and most of the people can afford to buy one, even in developed countries, people can have access to water easily. For example, Gaza right now faces a huge food flow, but people there can filter rain, or dig an underground hole to make a well.
Moreover, another issue would occur, which is that big countries by area are going to face economic problems, because of the huge population they have. For instance, Canada, one of the biggest countries, did an assessment to show how much water people would use, turned out that most of the economic sources are from buying water. Imagine if it were free!
To sum up my words, of course, it is a necessity, and a basic human need, but having it for free won’t help solve other human problems, like starvation, or wars. It is essential that citizens should drink clean water, but on the other hand, the country may fail, because of the significant decline in the country’s income.
the first sentence
Having hygienic water is one of the important human rights. And by that, each house should get water for free. This essay disagrees with the statement, because water is affordable. Additionally, Big countries would suffer economically
Band 8
Humans should have access to free, clean water that can support their lives. I agree with this viewpoint because it can provide them with a wide range of advantages that can lead to a better life.
To begin with, water is one of the most essential needs for many, not only for individuals but also for nature. According to the fact that more than 70 percent of people’s bodies are made up mostly of water, it is evidence that they require water to survive. If people are provided with a sufficient amount of water, they are able to stay hydrated, which is crucial to their overall well-being. Water use is not limited to drinking but also to being used for other daily activities, such as washing clothes and cooking meals, which are crucial for supporting healthy behavior. For example, when certain parts of Indonesia are exposed to flooding, what causes death is often not the flood itself, but the time after that, where they have difficulties finding clean water.
Furthermore, although water may not seem as important as money, when it is hard to find, people might immediately realize its importance. The example mentioned earlier can limit people from having smooth and enjoyable endeavors, which can affect their ability to live well. If they run out of clean clothes or dishes, for instance, they might consider it a bad day, leading to a ruined mood throughout the day. As a result, their performance at work or at school is negatively affected.
In conclusion, I believe that having access to clean water provides significant benefits to individuals, as it can positively impact their lives.
There is no doubt that water is a basic need of humans, and they cannot survive without drinking water. Therefore, access to clean water is a primary right of everyone; that’s why water supply should be provided at each home without any cost. I strongly agree with this statement because dirty water can cause many diseases in people; also, it is used without any limit in every house, so a charge on it will be unfair behaviour under a good government.
First and foremost, a human being cannot drink contaminated water that comes in the taps of houses. The main reason is its taste, which is salty and feels like sea water. The second reason is the side effects, because this water leads to many illnesses, which might be contagious. It is shown by a report of the “Pakistan Health Association Committee” that illustrates that many people in Karachi had died because of the intake of unclean water in 2012. There were also many cases reported about stomach allergies due to the chemicals in the water.
On the other hand, water is a blessing, and it has become less available because of extra use of it in the past. It was clean, but it has become impure due to many activities of humans. Authorities should ensure that every household has a good water supply system free of charge. However, it is their responsibility to complete the basic need of individuals as they take many taxes on each product. For instance, Australia has ensured the facility of pure water, not only at home but also has installed many water tanks in the streets.
In conclusion, I would say that water should be bacteria-free, as it has direct concerns with health; hence, states should fulfil this requirement as a responsibility and also for humanity.
Band 6.5
Nowadays, a lot of people think that access to clean water is a basic human right and every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. I partly agree with this opinion, because water is essential for humans, but this resource should be controlled by governments in order to avoid over consumption.
On the one hand, water is one of the main resources for living. Firstly, water is necessary for drinking, cooking, and using in different ways of life. Without it, people’s health can be seriously affected. Therefore, governments should pay a big attention to controlling the quality of water. For example, in some developing countries, people may get sick because of bad quality of water.
On the other hand, providing free water can lead to wasting. When people do not pay for a resource, they may not understand the value and use more than necessary. In addition, water supply systems require big investments. If water is free, governments may spend more money.
In my own opinion, a balanced approach would be more effective. Governments should controll the consumption of water for free. For instance, they can provide fixed amount of free water and take money for extra volumes. This balanced system could help to not waste water and contribute to energy security.
In conclusion, although clean water is a basic human right, it should not be absolutely free. A mixed system would be the best solution to meet both social and economic needs.
band 8.5
Access to clean water is widely recognized as a fundamental human right, essential for survival, health, and overall well-being. Consequently, many argue that governments should provide a free water supply to every household. I largely agree with this perspective, although certain limitations must be considered.
First and foremost, providing free access to clean water ensures basic human dignity and helps prevent serious health problems. Without safe drinking water, individuals are at risk of diseases such as infections and dehydration. In numerous developing countries, families struggle to afford clean water, leading to poor hygiene and the spread of illness. By making water freely available, governments can significantly improve public health and reduce long-term medical costs.
Furthermore, a free water supply promotes social equality. Wealthier individuals can easily afford water, while low-income families may face challenges in meeting even their basic needs. Treating water as a free public service can help bridge the gap between different social classes and ensure that everyone has equal opportunities to lead a healthy life. For instance, in some countries where basic utilities are subsidized, people enjoy a higher standard of living and experience fewer health-related issues.
However, completely providing free water may lead to overconsumption and waste. When individuals do not pay for a resource, they may not use it responsibly, resulting in water shortages, particularly in regions where water is already scarce. To address this issue, governments could offer a limited amount of water for free while charging for excessive usage. This approach encourages responsible consumption while still guaranteeing basic access.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that clean water should be accessible to everyone at no cost, as it is vital for life and equality. Nonetheless, implementing controlled usage policies is necessary to prevent waste and ensure sustainability.
Band 7
Nowadays, almost every individual has access to clean water, due to basic human rights. It is an ordinary requirement for a convenient life. However, there is a growing sentiment among the public that every home should have a water supply. Moreover, this supply has to be provided free of charge.
From my perspective, this implementation is not beneficial. The world’s water supply is not infinite, and there is no way to create new water by human hands. It is only a rule of nature. Imagine if every individual uses water without any payment for it. This way, who would work at the stations which provide us water? Charging an affordable fee makes people use water with responsibility. There could not exist any balance when people use different amounts of water compared to each other. Such a decision may result in numerous drawbacks, including an inequality in who is able to consume more water due to their habitat.
Conversely, there are notable disadvantages in the use of water without a fee. Transporting and providing clean water is an enormous industry with thousands of people working there. These people are ordinary citizens who want to earn money and have their own salary. If humans do not pay for water, income in the economy would be sharply reduced. As a result, it would be a strong hit for the economies in every country.
All in all, a water fee plays a crucial role in today’s world. Thanks to this fee, every individual can have access to clean water. Payment is quite affordable. Due to this, I firmly believe that every working person is able to pay a basic fee. Our water steps are essential for our planet. We should not forget about basic rules of water saving.
band 8.5
Recently, the opinion that the ability to attain safe, potable liquids at no cost is a fundamental entitlement has become increasingly common around the world. Although some may disagree, I strongly believe that this vital resource must be available worldwide to marginalized groups who can’t acquire a purified provision due to a number of factors.
First of all, individuals who have this resource provided gratis will find it very worthwhile. Due to the fact that H2O is a necessity for everyday use, it is true that not everyone can budget for it; therefore, being able to obtain treated utility without a fee is remarkably convenient, which means that citizens enjoy a superior lifestyle. For instance, segments of society with contaminant-free liquid available won’t have to worry about the expense, whereas the population that cannot financially avail themselves of it may have no such option. Hence, mankind will gain many upsides by saving their money instead of spending it on basic survival needs.
Furthermore, not everyone has the means to manage the cost of sanitized liquid, meaning a decontaminated distribution ought to be an essential liberty. As a case in point, essential fluid is what humanity needs in order to survive. Thus, without it, the body won’t be able to function.
In conclusion, even though some may argue otherwise, it is true that having a safe reserve offers a better quality of life. From my perspective, persons who want better health must agree that purified water is a basic prerequisite so that they can enjoy an enhanced quality of life.
band 7
In our society, clean water has been considered a basic human right. However, in reality, most parts of the world still do not have access to this resource. Someone might believe that it does not mean that the government isn’t responsible for a free supply or charge, but I completely disagree with this opinion. I am sure that the government must build a comfortable state for citizens, including providing clean water.
To begin with, access to a clean water is a basic human rights, be the way, in consequence, the government should provide the necessary resource as well as is possible. In other words, every individual deserves to have a free supply. Availability of necessary resources is about people’s health, and in addition, is related to hygiene. Clean water could prevent diseases, which as a result lead to population health increasing. For example, unaccess to minimal hygiene could raise risks for viruses or harmful bacteria involving.
Moreover, there are situations in third-world countries such as Afghanistan, the Central African Republic, and etc. In these areas, the population, especially children, are dying on a regular basis, which means decreasing all fields of the country, by consuming unclean water or lack of essential resources.
Overall, I strongly keep the statement of necessary water provided free of charge because it is a basic human right. It’s not even about the government’s needs; it’s also about people’s health and preventing any diseases in the future.
R u using paid version or free because it is demanding payment from me
Access to clean water is universally recognized as a fundamental human right. Consequently, it is essential that measures are taken to ensure its availability for all individuals. However, I contend that the assertion that clean water should be provided entirely free of charge is not entirely feasible. The provision of clean water necessitates substantial investment in infrastructure and technology, which incurs significant costs. It is more pragmatic to offer complimentary access solely to financially disadvantaged individuals, while imposing fees on wealthier residents.
Moreover, it is the government’s responsibility to safeguard essential rights, including the right to clean water. Nevertheless, the logistics of distributing clean water entail considerable financial outlays, which encompass both the development of infrastructure and ongoing maintenance expenses. Granting free access to clean water for every household could jeopardize state budgets, potentially leading to fiscal instability and a strain on public resources.
That being said, it is crucial for the government to establish equitable regulations for access to clean water. For instance, individuals hailing from low-income backgrounds, particularly those in rural locales where access is limited, should be granted complimentary water supply. Conversely, wealthier residents residing in urban environments could bear the responsibility of payment, based on their monthly water consumption, thereby ensuring a fair distribution of resources.
In conclusion, while access to clean water is an undeniable necessity that must be prioritized by the state, the concept of providing it for free should be judiciously regulated. By restricting complimentary access to economically disadvantaged groups, we can uphold the principles of justice and equity for all citizens, ensuring that no one is deprived of this vital resource due to financial constraints.
When it comes to the issue of basic human rights to access clean water, a significant number of inhabitants stand with different kinds of views. While, a good number of individuals tend to take this issue as rosy, others seem to hold the opposite tend. However, I am going to outline both side of this prior to giving a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, a great number of merits comes from this affair in many ways. The first and foremost point is that I think the government in any country should supply the population with free access water because it is one of the basic human rights. In other words, every individual deserve to access a free water supply. Furthermore, clean water prevents disease and encourages proper hygiene at home. In addition, if people consume clean water regularly, it will reduce disease and promote health; as a result, it will enhance the community health and reduce government spending on treatment and medicine.
However, it also seems to be likely to come up with a couple of shortcomings. To begin with, people who live in poverty would struggle if water fees were added; it will put a lot of pressure on them. This is already the case in various countries. Moreover, Factories in many countries dump their waste water directly into rivers, making clean water polluting. Due to which it is becoming very difficult for countryside people to get fresh water; in that case, government should supply free fresh water for those community. In other cases, in many urban areas, people are seen wasting a lot of water, in which cases, the price of water should definitely be included.
To sum up, having illustrated both sides of this affair, I would like to state my opinion that I strongly agree with this statement as it comes up with a good number of merits.