The Conquest Of Malaria In Italy, 1900-1962 - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Recent Actual Test 2 Academic Reading Test 7 · Part 2 · Questions 14–26
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26 which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
The Conquest of Malaria in Italy, 1900-1962
Mal-aria. Bad air. Even the word is Italian, and this horrible disease marked the life of those in the peninsula for thousands of years. Yet by 1962, Italy was officially declared malaria-free, and it has remained so ever since. Frank Snowden's study of this success story takes us to areas historians have rarely visited before.
A Everybody now knows that malaria is carried by mosquitoes. But in the 19th century, most experts believed that the disease was produced by “miasma” or “poisoning of the air”. Others made a link between swamps, water and malaria, but did not make the further leap towards insects. The consequences of these theories were that little was done to combat the disease before the end of the century. Things became so bad that 11m Italians (from a total population of 25m) were “permanently at risk”. In malarial zones the life expectancy of land workers was a terrifying 22.5 years. Those who escaped death were weakened or suffered from splenomegaly — a “painful enlargement of the spleen” and “a lifeless stare”. The economic impact of the disease was immense. Epidemics were blamed on southern Italians, given the widespread belief that malaria was hereditary. In the 1880s, such theories began to collapse as the dreaded mosquito was identified as the real culprit.
B Italian scientists, drawing on the pioneering work of French doctor Alphonse Laveran, were able to predict the cycles of fever but it was in Rome that further key discoveries were made. Giovanni Battista Grassi, a naturalist, found that a particular type of mosquito was the carrier of malaria. By experimenting on healthy volunteers (mosquitoes were released into rooms where they drank the blood of the human guinea pigs), Grassi was able to make the direct link between the insects (all females of a certain kind) and the disease. Soon, doctors and scientists made another startling discovery: the mosquitoes themselves were also infected and not mere carriers. Every year, during the mosquito season, malarial blood was moved around the population by the insects. Definitive proof of these new theories was obtained after an extraordinary series of experiments in Italy, where healthy people were introduced into malarial zones but kept free of mosquito bites — and remained well. The new Italian state had the necessary information to tackle the disease.
C A complicated approach was adopted, which made use of quinine - a drug obtained from tree bark which had long been used to combat fever, but was now seen as a crucial part of the war on malaria. Italy introduced a quinine law and a quinine tax in 1904, and the drug was administered to large numbers of rural workers. Despite its often terrible side-effects (the headaches produced were known as the “quinine-buzz”) the drug was successful in limiting the spread of the disease, and in breaking cycles of infection. In addition, Italy set up rural health centres and invested heavily in education programmes. Malaria, as Snowden shows, was not just a medical problem, but a social and regional issue, and could only be defeated through multi-layered strategies. Politics was itself transformed by the anti-malarial campaigns. It was originally decided to give quinine to all those in certain regions — even healthy people; peasants were often suspicious of medicine being forced upon them. Doctors were sometimes met with hostility and refusal, and many were dubbed “poisoners”.
D Despite these problems, the strategy was hugely successful. Deaths from malaria fell by some 80% in the first decade of the 20th century and some areas escaped altogether from the scourge of the disease. War, from 1915-18, delayed the campaign. Funds were diverted to the battlefields and the fight against malaria became a military issue, laying the way for the fascist approach to the problem. Mussolini's policies in the 20s and 30s are subjected to a serious cross-examination by Snowden. He shows how much of the regime's claims to have “eradicated” malaria through massive land reclamation, forced population removals and authoritarian clean-ups were pure propaganda. Mass draining was instituted — often at a great cost as Mussolini waged war not on the disease itself, but on the mosquitoes that carried it. The cleansing of Italy was also ethnic, as “carefully selected” Italians were chosen to inhabit the gleaming new towns of the former marshlands around Rome. The “successes” under fascism were extremely vulnerable, based as they were on a top-down concept of eradication. As war swept through the drained lands in the 40s, the disease returned with a vengeance.
E In the most shocking part of the book, Snowden describes — passionately, but with the skill of a great historian — how the retreating Nazi armies in Italy in 1943-44 deliberately caused a massive malaria epidemic in Lazio. It was “the only known example of biological warfare in 20th-century Europe”. Shamefully, the Italian malaria expert Alberto Missiroli had a role to play in the disaster: he did not distribute quinine, despite being well aware of the epidemic to come. Snowden claims that Missiroli was already preparing a new strategy — with the support of the US Rockefeller Foundation — using a new pesticide, DDT. Missiroli allowed the epidemic to spread, in order to create the ideal conditions for a massive, and lucrative, human experiment. Fifty-five thousand cases of malaria were recorded in the province of Littoria alone in 1944. It is estimated that more than a third of those in the affected area contracted the disease. Thousands, nobody knows how many, died. With the war over, the US government and the Rockefeller Foundation were free to experiment. DDT was sprayed from the air and 3m Italians had their bodies covered with the chemical. The effects were dramatic, and nobody really cared about the toxic effects of the chemical.
F By 1962, malaria was more or less gone from the whole peninsula. The last cases were noted in a poor region of Sicily. One of the final victims to die of the disease in Italy was the popular cyclist, Fausto Coppi. He had contracted malaria in Africa in 1960, and the failure of doctors in the north of Italy to spot the disease was a sign of the times. A few decades earlier, they would have immediately noticed the tell-tale signs; it was later claimed that a small dose of quinine would have saved his life. As there are still more than 1m deaths every year from malaria worldwide, Snowden's book also has contemporary relevance. This is a disease that affects every level of the societies where it is rampant. It also provides us with “a message of hope for a world struggling with the great present-day medical emergency”.
Questions
Questions 14–18 Summary Completion
Complete the summary below using NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage.
Before the link between malaria and 14 was established, there were many popular theories circulating among the public, one of which points to 15 , the unclean air. The lack of proper treatment affected the country so badly that rural people in malaria infested places had extremely short 16 . The disease spread so quickly, especially in the south of Italy, thus giving rise to the idea that the disease was 17 . People believed in these theories until mosquito was found to be the 18 in the 1880s.
Questions 19–21 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Questions 22–26 Matching Information
Reading Passage 2 has six paragraphs, A-F.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q14 | insects / mosquitoes | Grassi was able to make the direct link between the insects (all females of a certain kind) and the disease | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that a scientist named Grassi proved there was a connection between insects and the sickness. This shows that the link was between malaria and insects. Answer Explanation: The answer means that before people understood the connection between malaria and small bugs like mosquitoes, they believed other things caused the sickness. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'insects/mosquitoes' because the passage first describes old, wrong ideas about what caused malaria, like 'bad air'. Then, it explains that scientists later did experiments and found the 'direct link' between the disease and a type of 'insect', specifically the mosquito. |
| Q15 | miasma | But in the 19th century, most experts believed that the disease was produced by “miasma” or “poisoning of the air” | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that a long time ago, most smart people thought that malaria was caused by something called 'miasma,' which means bad or poisoned air. Answer Explanation: The answer 'miasma' is an old word for bad or unclean air, which people once thought caused diseases. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'miasma' because the summary asks for a theory about how 'unclean air' caused malaria. The passage explains that before people knew mosquitoes were the cause, 'most experts believed that the disease was produced by “miasma” or “poisoning of the air”'. 'Miasma' is the specific word from the passage that means unclean or bad air. |
| Q16 | life expectancy | In malarial zones the life expectancy of land workers was a terrifying 22.5 years | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in areas where malaria was common ('malarial zones'), people who worked on farms ('land workers') were only expected to live for 22.5 years, which is a very short and scary amount of time. Answer Explanation: The answer 'life expectancy' means how long, on average, a person is expected to live. The sentence means that people who lived in the countryside where malaria was common did not live very long. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'life expectancy' because the summary states that rural people in places with malaria had an 'extremely short' life. The passage provides the specific information for this, saying that in 'malarial zones' the 'life expectancy of land workers' (another way of saying rural people) was a very low '22.5 years'. |
| Q17 | hereditary | Epidemics were blamed on southern Italians, given the widespread belief that malaria was hereditary | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that sickness outbreaks (epidemics) were blamed on people from the south of Italy because many people thought that malaria was a sickness passed from parents to children. Answer Explanation: The answer means that people believed malaria was a sickness that parents passed down to their children. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'hereditary' because the passage explains that when many people got sick from malaria, especially in the south, there was a common idea about why. The passage states there was a 'widespread belief that malaria was hereditary', which means people thought it was passed through families. |
| Q18 | culprit / real culprit | In the 1880s, such theories began to collapse as the dreaded mosquito was identified as the real culprit | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in the 1880s, the old ideas ('theories') about how malaria spread started to seem wrong. This is because people learned that the mosquito was the actual thing responsible for the disease. Answer Explanation: The answer 'culprit' or 'real culprit' means the person or thing that caused a problem or did something wrong. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'real culprit' because the summary states that people stopped believing the old theories when they found out the mosquito was the cause. The passage explains this exact moment. It says that the previous theories 'began to collapse' when the mosquito was named, or 'identified', as the 'real culprit'. This means the mosquito was discovered to be the true cause of the disease. |
| Q19 | NOT GIVEN | By experimenting on healthy volunteers (mosquitoes were released into rooms where they drank the blood of the human guinea pigs), Grassi was able to make the direct link between the insects (all females of a certain kind) and the disease | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that scientists did experiments with people called 'healthy volunteers'. However, the text does not say which city or region in Italy these people came from. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN. This means the passage does not say where the volunteers for the experiments came from. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage mentions experiments in Italy using 'healthy volunteers', but it does not provide any details about where these people were from. The text does not say if they came from 'all over Italy' or just from one area. Since this information is missing, we cannot know if the statement is true or false. |
| Q20 | TRUE | In malarial zones the life expectancy of land workers was a terrifying 22.5 years. Those who escaped death were weakened or suffered from splenomegaly — a “painful enlargement of the spleen” and “a lifeless stare” | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that some people 'escaped death'. This means they did not die from malaria. So, even though life was very difficult and short for many, it was possible for some people to stay alive in areas with malaria. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE. This means the statement, 'It's possible to come out of malarial zones alive,' is correct according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explicitly mentions people who survived malaria. In the first paragraph, it describes the terrible conditions in malarial areas but also says, 'Those who escaped death'. This phrase directly tells us that not everyone died; some people managed to live, proving that it was possible to survive in these zones. |
| Q21 | FALSE | It was originally decided to give quinine to all those in certain regions — even healthy people; peasants were often suspicious of medicine being forced upon them. Doctors were sometimes met with hostility and refusal, and many were dubbed “poisoners” | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says the government planned to give a medicine called quinine to everyone in some places. However, many farmers (peasants) did not trust the medicine. They said no to taking it and were unfriendly to the doctors, even calling them 'poisoners'. This shows that not everyone took the medicine. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE. This means it is not true that the government successfully gave quinine medication to all people. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage says that although the government decided to give quinine to people in certain areas, many people, especially peasants, did not want to take it. They were suspicious and refused the medicine, sometimes being hostile towards the doctors. This means the government's plan to give the medication to 'all' people was not successful. |
| Q22 | B | Giovanni Battista Grassi, a naturalist, found that a particular type of mosquito was the carrier of malaria. By experimenting on healthy volunteers (mosquitoes were released into rooms where they drank the blood of the human guinea pigs), Grassi was able to make the direct link between the insects (all females of a certain kind) and the disease. Soon, doctors and scientists made another startling discovery: the mosquitoes themselves were also infected and not mere carriers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that a scientist named Giovanni Battista Grassi discovered that a special kind of mosquito carried malaria. He used experiments with people to show the connection between the insects and the sickness. After that, scientists made another surprising discovery: the mosquitoes were not just carrying the disease, they were also sick with it. Answer Explanation: The answer B is correct. This means that paragraph B contains information about a very important new discovery about what causes malaria. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because this paragraph describes the important new discoveries, or 'breakthroughs', that proved mosquitoes cause malaria. Before this discovery, people wrongly believed the disease came from 'bad air'. Paragraph B explains how a scientist named Giovanni Battista Grassi did experiments to find the 'direct link' between insects and the disease. It also mentions another 'startling discovery' that the mosquitoes were themselves infected, which was a new and important idea. |
| Q23 | F | As there are still more than 1m deaths every year from malaria worldwide, Snowden's book also has contemporary relevance. This is a disease that affects every level of the societies where it is rampant. It also provides us with “a message of hope for a world struggling with the great present-day medical emergency” | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that because malaria is still a big problem around the world, the story in the book is important today. It also gives a 'message of hope' for people now who are fighting big health problems. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the story about how Italy beat malaria is useful and important for people living today. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because this paragraph connects the historical story of malaria in Italy to the present. It says the story has 'contemporary relevance', which means it is important now. It also mentions that the story offers a 'message of hope' for the world's 'present-day medical emergency'. This shows the story is meant for today's readers, not just as a history lesson. |
| Q24 | E | Shamefully, the Italian malaria expert Alberto Missiroli had a role to play in the disaster: he did not distribute quinine, despite being well aware of the epidemic to come | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that an expert on malaria in Italy, Alberto Missiroli, was part of a terrible event. He did not give out the medicine called quinine, even though he knew that a big sickness was about to happen. Answer Explanation: The answer is E. This means paragraph E talks about an expert person who did not stop a sickness from spreading. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because this paragraph describes Alberto Missiroli, who was an 'expert' on malaria in Italy. The passage says he knew that a big outbreak, an 'epidemic', was going to happen. But he 'did not distribute quinine,' which was the medicine used to stop malaria. This means he chose not to do anything to 'restrict the spread of the disease'. |
| Q25 | D | The “successes” under fascism were extremely vulnerable, based as they were on a top-down concept of eradication. As war swept through the drained lands in the 40s, the disease returned with a vengeance | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the good results of the fascist government's fight against malaria were not strong and could easily fail. When war happened in the 1940s, malaria came back and became a very bad problem again. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the information about a problem or delay in the fight against malaria, which was caused by government actions, is in paragraph D. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because this paragraph describes how government policies created a 'setback', or a problem that stopped progress. First, it mentions that World War I 'delayed the campaign' against malaria. Then, it talks about Mussolini's government policies, saying they were not as successful as claimed and were 'pure propaganda'. These policies were weak, and because of this, when war came again in the 1940s, the disease 'returned with a vengeance,' meaning it came back very strong. This shows a major setback caused by government decisions. |
| Q26 | A | Those who escaped death were weakened or suffered from splenomegaly — a “painful enlargement of the spleen” and “a lifeless stare” | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that people who got malaria and did not die from it became very weak. They also suffered from a condition where their spleen, an organ inside the body, grew bigger and became painful. Additionally, their eyes looked empty, as if they had no life or energy. Answer Explanation: The answer is A. This means the information about how malaria affects people's bodies is in the first paragraph of the text, which is labeled with the letter A. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because this paragraph describes the physical symptoms and health problems caused by malaria. It mentions that people who got the disease became 'weakened' and suffered from 'splenomegaly,' which is a 'painful enlargement of the spleen' (a body part). It also describes their appearance, saying they had a 'lifeless stare.' These are all ways malaria affects the human body. |
