The Fruit Book - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Recent Actual Test 1 Academic Reading Test 3 · Part 3 · Questions 27–40
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
The Fruit Book
It's not every scientist who writes books for people who can't read. And how many scientists want their books to look as dog-eared as possible? But Patricia Shanley, an ethnobotanist, wanted to give something back. After the poorest people of the Amazon allowed her to study their land and its ecology, she turned her research findings into a picture book that tells the local people how to get a good return on their trees without succumbing to the lure of a quick buck from a logging company. It has proved a big success.
A The book is called Fruit Trees and Useful Plants in the Lives of Amazonians, but is better known simply as the "fruit book". The second edition was produced at the request of politicians in western Amazonia. Its blend of hard science and local knowledge on the use and trade of 35 native forest species has been so well received (and well used) that no less a dignitary than Brazil's environment minister, Marina Silva, has written the foreword. "There is nothing else like the Shanley book," says Adalberto Verrísimo, director of the Institute of People and the Environment of the Amazon. "It gives science back to the poor, to the people who really need it."
B Shanley's work on the book began a decade ago, with a plea for help from the Rural Workers' Union of Paragominas, a Brazilian town whose prosperity is based on exploitation of timber. The union realised that logging companies would soon be knocking on the doors of the caboclos, peasant farmers living on the Rio Capim, an Amazon tributary in the Brazilian state of Pará. Isolated and illiterate, the caboclos would have little concept of the true value of their trees; communities downstream had already sold off large blocks of forest for a pittance. "What they wanted to know was how valuable the forests were," recalls Shanley, then a researcher in the area for the Massachusetts-based Woods Hole Research Centre.
C The Rural Workers' Union wanted to know whether harvesting wild fruits would make economic sense in the Rio Capim. "There was a lot of interest in trading non-timber forest products (NTFPs)," Shanley says. At the time, environmental groups and green-minded businesses were promoting the idea. This was the view presented in a seminal paper, Valuation of an Amazonian Rainforest, published in Nature in 1989. The researchers had calculated that revenues from the sale of fruits could far exceed those from a one-off sale of trees to loggers. "The union was keen to discover whether it made more sense conserving the forest for subsistence use and the possible sale of fruit, game and medicinal plants, than selling trees for timber," says Shanley. Whether it would work for the caboclos was far from clear.
D Although Shanley had been invited to work in the Rio Capim, some caboclos were suspicious. "When Patricia asked if she could study my forest," says Joao Fernando Moreira Brito, "my neighbours said she was a foreigner who'd come to rob me of my trees." In the end, Moreira Brito, or Mangueira as he is known, welcomed Shanley and worked on her study. His land, an hour's walk from the Rio Capim, is almost entirely covered with primary forest. A study of this and other tracts of forest selected by the communities enabled Shanley to identify three trees, found throughout the Amazon, whose fruit was much favoured by the caboclos: bacuri (Platonia insignis), uxi (Endopleura uchi) and piquia (Cayocas villosum). The caboclos used their fruits, extracted oils, and knew what sort of wildlife they attracted. But, in the face of aggressive tactics from the logging companies, they had no measure of the trees' financial worth. The only way to find out, Shanley decided, was to start from scratch with a scientific study. "From a scientific point of view, hardly anything was known about these trees," she says. But six years of field research yielded a mass of data on their flowering and fruiting behaviour. During 1993 and 1994, 30 families weighed everything they used from the forest - game, fruit, fibre, medicinal plants – and documented its source.
E After three logging sales and a major fire in 1997, the researchers were also able to study the ecosystem's reaction to logging and disturbance. They carried out a similar, though less exhaustive, study in 1999, this time with 15 families. The changes were striking. Average annual household consumption of forest fruit had fallen from 89 to 28 kilogrammes between 1993 and 1999. "What we found," says Shanley, "was that fruit collection could coexist with a certain amount of logging, but after the forest fire it dropped dramatically." Over the same period, fibre use also dropped from around 20 to 4 kilogrammes. The fire and logging also changed the nature of the caboclo diet. In 1993 most households ate game two or three times a month. By 1999 some were fortunate if they ate game more than two or three times a year.
F The loss of certain species of tree was especially significant. Shanley's team persuaded local hunters to weigh their catch, noting the trees under which the animals were caught. Over the year, they trapped five species of game averaging 232 kilogrammes under piquia trees. Under copaiba, they caught just two species averaging 63 kilogrammes; and under uxi, four species weighing 38 kilogrammes. At last, the team was getting a handle on which trees were worth keeping, and which could reasonably be sold. "This showed that selling piquia trees to loggers for a few dollars made little sense,” explains Shanley. "Their local value lies in providing a prized fruit, as well as flowers which attract more game than any other species."
G As a result of these studies, Shanley had to tell the Rural Workers' Union of Paragominas that the Nature thesis could not be applied wholesale to their community - harvesting NTFPs would not always yield more than timber sales. Fruiting patterns of trees such as uxi were unpredictable, for example. In 1994, one household collected 3,654 uxi fruits; the following year, none at all.
H This is not to say that wild fruit trees were unimportant. On the contrary, argues Shanley, they are critical for subsistence, something that is often ignored in much of the current research on NTFPs, which tends to focus on their commercial potential. Geography was another factor preventing the Rio Capim caboclos from establishing a serious trade in wild fruit: villagers in remote areas could not compete with communities collecting NTFPs close to urban markets, although they could sell them to passing river boats.
I But Shanley and her colleagues decided to do more than just report their results to the union. Together with two of her research colleagues, Shanley wrote the fruit book. This, the Bible and a publication on medicinal plants co-authored by Shanley and designed for people with minimal literacy skills are about the only books you will see along this stretch of the Rio Capim. The first print ran to only 3,000 copies, but the fruit book has been remarkably influential, and is used by colleges, peasant unions, industries and the caboclos themselves. Its success is largely due to the fact that people with poor literacy skills can understand much of the information it contains about the non-timber forest products, thanks to its illustrations, anecdotes, stories and songs. "The book doesn't tell people what to do," says Shanley, "but it does provide them with choices." The caboclos who have used the book now have a much better understanding of which trees to sell to the loggers, and which to protect.
Questions
Questions 27–32 Matching Information
Reading Passage 3 has nine paragraphs A-I.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Questions 33–40 Summary Completion
Complete the summary below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Forest fire has caused local villagers to consume less:
33
34
Game
There is the least amount of game hunted under 35, and its fruit yield is also 36. Thus, it is more reasonable to keep 37.
All the trees can also be used for 38 besides selling them to loggers. But this is often ignored, because most researches usually focus on the 39 of the trees.
The purpose of the book: To give information about 40
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q27 | D | But six years of field research yielded a mass of data on their flowering and fruiting behaviour. During 1993 and 1994, 30 families weighed everything they used from the forest - game, fruit, fibre, medicinal plants – and documented its source | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Shanley did research in the field for six years to learn about the trees. It explains that in 1993 and 1994, she had thirty local families measure the weight of all the things they got from the forest, like animals, fruit, and plants, and write down where they found them. This was how she started collecting her information. Answer Explanation: The answer is D. This means paragraph D describes how Shanley first started to collect information for her research. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because this paragraph explains the beginning of Shanley's scientific study. The question asks for her 'initial data collection', which means the first time she gathered information. Paragraph D describes how she decided to start a study from 'scratch' and details how '30 families weighed everything they used from the forest' in the years 1993 and 1994. Other paragraphs talk about why she started the study or what she found later, but only paragraph D describes the first process of collecting data. |
| Q28 | A | Its blend of hard science and local knowledge on the use and trade of 35 native forest species has been so well received (and well used) that no less a dignitary than Brazil's environment minister, Marina Silva, has written the foreword | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the book combined science with what local people knew. It was so popular and useful that a very important person ('a dignitary'), who was Brazil's environment minister, wrote the special introduction at the beginning of the book, known as a 'foreword'. Answer Explanation: The answer is A. This means paragraph A contains the information about a government official's contribution to the book. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because this paragraph mentions that Brazil's environment minister, a government official, wrote the introduction (the foreword) for the book. It explains that the book was very successful and well-received because it mixed science with local knowledge, which is why such an important person contributed to it. |
| Q29 | C | "The union was keen to discover whether it made more sense conserving the forest for subsistence use and the possible sale of fruit, game and medicinal plants, than selling trees for timber," says Shanley | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the local union really wanted to know which option was better for them: to protect the forest for their own use and to sell products like fruit, or to sell the trees to be cut down for wood. Answer Explanation: The answer is C. This means that paragraph C explains the reasons why the local community wanted Patricia Shanley to do her research. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because this paragraph details the specific questions the Rural Workers' Union had. They wanted to know if it would be more profitable ('make economic sense') to keep the forest and sell 'non-timber forest products' (NTFPs) like fruit and plants, instead of selling their trees to logging companies for wood ('timber'). A scientific paper had suggested this was possible, so the union asked Shanley to find out if it would work for them. The keywords are 'wanted to know whether', 'economic sense', 'sale of fruit', and 'than selling trees for timber'. |
| Q30 | B | Shanley's work on the book began a decade ago, with a plea for help from the Rural Workers' Union of Paragominas, a Brazilian town whose prosperity is based on exploitation of timber | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Shanley's work started ten years ago. It began because a group of workers, the Rural Workers' Union, asked her for help. Answer Explanation: The answer is B. This means that paragraph B talks about when and why Patricia Shanley started her research. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because this paragraph explains the 'starting point' of Shanley's work. The text says her research 'began' when a group called the Rural Workers' Union asked for her 'help'. They wanted to know the value of their forest before logging companies arrived. This request was the beginning of her study. |
| Q31 | E | The fire and logging also changed the nature of the caboclo diet | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the fire and the cutting down of trees (logging) made a difference in what the local people, called caboclos, ate. Answer Explanation: The answer is E. This means that paragraph E talks about two things that changed what people ate. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because this paragraph describes how 'logging' (cutting down trees) and a 'forest fire' changed the eating habits of the local people. The text says that after the fire and logging, the amount of fruit people 'had fallen' and they ate 'game' (wild animals) much less often. These two things, logging and fire, are the 'two factors' that changed what people ate, which is their 'food consumption pattern'. |
| Q32 | I | Its success is largely due to the fact that people with poor literacy skills can understand much of the information it contains about the non-timber forest products, thanks to its illustrations, anecdotes, stories and songs | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the book's success came from being easy for people with poor reading skills to use. This is because it presents information with pictures, stories, and songs, not just words. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'I'. This means paragraph 'I' explains the reasons for the fruit book's success. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'I' because this paragraph directly explains why the book became successful. It states that the book was 'remarkably influential' and is used by many different groups. The main reason for its success, as the paragraph mentions, is that it was made for people who cannot read well ('poor literacy skills'). It uses pictures ('illustrations'), stories ('anecdotes'), and songs, which makes the information easy to understand. |
| Q33 | Fruit | Average annual household consumption of forest fruit had fallen from 89 to 28 kilogrammes between 1993 and 1999 | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the amount of forest fruit that families ate each year went down. It was 89 kilograms, but after a period that included a fire, it dropped to 28 kilograms. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'Fruit'. 'Fruit' means things like apples, bananas, or berries that grow on plants and trees and can be eaten. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Fruit' because the passage explains that after a major fire in the forest, the amount of fruit that families ate and collected went down by a lot. The passage states that the average household consumption of 'forest fruit' had 'fallen' significantly. |
| Q34 | Fibre | Over the same period, fibre use also dropped from around 20 to 4 kilogrammes | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that in the same amount of time, the amount of fibre people used went down from about 20 kilograms to only 4 kilograms. Answer Explanation: The answer 'Fibre' means a material from plants that people can use to make things like ropes or baskets. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'Fibre' because the summary asks what local people consumed less of after a forest fire. The passage compares consumption before and after the fire and states that 'fibre use also dropped'. This shows that villagers used less fibre after the fire. |
| Q35 | uxi | Over the year, they trapped five species of game averaging 232 kilogrammes under piquia trees. Under copaiba, they caught just two species averaging 63 kilogrammes; and under uxi, four species weighing 38 kilogrammes | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that researchers weighed the animals, or 'game', that hunters caught under different trees. They found 232 kilograms of game under piquia trees, 63 kilograms under copaiba trees, and 38 kilograms under uxi trees. Because 38 is the smallest number, the least amount of game was hunted under 'uxi' trees. Answer Explanation: The answer is 'uxi'. 'Uxi' is the name of a type of tree in the Amazon forest. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'uxi' because the summary asks for the tree under which the 'least amount of game' (hunted animals) is found. The passage compares the weight of game caught under different trees. It states that under 'piquia' trees, 232 kilograms were caught, under 'copaiba' trees, 63 kilograms were caught, and under 'uxi' trees, 38 kilograms were caught. Since 38 kilograms is the smallest amount, 'uxi' is the correct answer. |
| Q36 | unpredictable | Fruiting patterns of trees such as uxi were unpredictable, for example. In 1994, one household collected 3,654 uxi fruits; the following year, none at all | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the way trees like the uxi produce fruit was 'unpredictable.' This means you could not know how much fruit it would have. For instance, one family gathered 3,654 uxi fruits in one year, but the next year, they did not get any fruit at all. Answer Explanation: The answer 'unpredictable' means something cannot be guessed or known before it happens. In this context, it means the amount of fruit a tree produces changes a lot and is not the same every year. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'unpredictable' because the passage uses the uxi tree as an example of a tree whose fruit production is not reliable. The text says its 'fruiting patterns' were 'unpredictable'. To explain this, it gives data showing that one family collected thousands of fruits one year but then got 'none at all' the next year. |
| Q37 | piquia | "This showed that selling piquia trees to loggers for a few dollars made little sense,” explains Shanley. "Their local value lies in providing a prized fruit, as well as flowers which attract more game than any other species." | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that it is not a good idea to sell piquia trees for only a small amount of money. The reason is that these trees are very important to the local community ('local value'). They provide a special, well-liked fruit ('prized fruit') and have flowers that bring in more animals to hunt ('game') than any other type of tree. Answer Explanation: The answer 'piquia' is the name of a specific type of tree found in the Amazon. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'piquia' because the passage explains that this tree is very valuable to the local people. It provides them with a popular fruit and its flowers attract more animals for hunting ('game') than any other tree. Because the tree is so useful, the passage states that selling it for a little money 'made little sense', which means it is more reasonable to keep it. |
| Q38 | subsistence | On the contrary, argues Shanley, they are critical for subsistence, something that is often ignored in much of the current research on NTFPs, which tends to focus on their commercial potential | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the fruit trees are very important ('critical') for people's daily living ('subsistence'). This important use is often forgotten ('ignored') by researchers, who mostly study how the trees can be used to make money ('their commercial potential'). Answer Explanation: The answer 'subsistence' means using something, like the fruit from trees, to live and survive, not to sell for money. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'subsistence' because the passage states that the wild fruit trees are very important ('critical') for the people's daily life and survival. It says this use is often forgotten ('ignored') in research because researchers usually focus on how to make money ('commercial potential') from the trees. This directly answers the summary's question about what the trees are used for besides selling. |
| Q39 | commercial potential | On the contrary, argues Shanley, they are critical for subsistence, something that is often ignored in much of the current research on NTFPs, which tends to focus on their commercial potential | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the trees are very important for people's daily life ('subsistence'). However, this is often forgotten in many studies ('research'). This is because the studies usually look at how much money can be made from selling the forest products ('commercial potential'). Answer Explanation: The answer means how much money can be made by selling something. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'commercial potential' because the summary states that most research focuses on one aspect of the trees, causing another to be ignored. The passage explains that the use of trees for everyday life ('subsistence') is 'often ignored' in research. This is because this research 'tends to focus on their commercial potential'—how much money can be made from them. |
| Q40 | NTFPs / non-timber forest products | Its success is largely due to the fact that people with poor literacy skills can understand much of the information it contains about the non-timber forest products, thanks to its illustrations, anecdotes, stories and songs | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says the book is very successful because people who cannot read well can still understand the information in it about things from the forest that are not wood. Answer Explanation: The answer means the book gives information about products from the forest that are not wood, such as fruits, plants, and game animals. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'NTFPs/non-timber forest products' because the passage clearly states that the book's success is because it helps people with low reading skills understand information about these specific types of products. The whole purpose of the research and the book was to help local people understand the value of these items compared to selling trees for wood (timber). |
