🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Line Graph

Band 6+: WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

Image for topic: WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a line graph with years 2000 to 2010 on the x-axis and water consumption in cubic meters on the y-axis, ranging from 0 to 2500 m³. Two lines represent Australia and Russia. Australia's consumption starts at 500 m³ in 2000, rises steadily to approximately 1000 m³ in 2005, continues increasing to 1700 m³ by 2010. Russia's consumption begins at 1000 m³ in 2000, peaks at about 1900 m³ in 2003, dips to 1400 m³ in 2005, then ascends to around 2100 m³ in 2010.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graph compares the consumption of water for agricultural reasons between Australia and Russia over a ten-year period from 2000 to 2010.

Overall, it is evident that both countries had a substantial increased usage at the end of the period. But Russia had increased slightly more than the opposing nation.

To begin with, in 2000, Australia had a low but relatively stable water consumption of 500 cubic metres and had a rapid growth following the next two years. This resulted to a gradual increase and reached a peak of about 2000 cubic metres by the end of the period.

In contrast, Russia had double the usage at the begining of the period and a sharp rise of approximately 1800 cubic metres in 2003. However, in 2007, the figure dropped suddenly to about 1300 metres and rose gradually just above 2000 cubic metres in the following three years, surpassing the opposing country.

Word Count: 152

Answers On The Same Topic:

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The line chart compares water consumption for agricultural purposes in Australia and Russia from 2000 to 2010. Overall Australia’s water consumption increased slightly meanwhile Russia’s water consumption showed fluctations through the ten year period. The chart illustrates that Australia remained nearly stable between 2000 and 2002. Then in 2003 the water consumption rose dramatically for […]

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The given graph provides information about the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two various countries from 2000 to 2010. Overall, it is evident that the utilisation of water for agricultural purposes showed significant increase over the years in Australia and Russia. Firstly, in 2000, Australia used 500 cubic meters of water which rose […]

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The graph presents details about the expenditure of water for agricultural reasons in two areas from 2000 and 2010. Overview, the number of usage of water grown in Australia. Meanwhile in Russia agricultural people used water with some fluctuations. From 2000 to 2003 the water consumption in Russia rises to 2700 m3. After that, to […]

WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The graph below gives information on the usage of water for agricultural purposes in two different countries between 2000 to 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.

The given line graph illustrates the water consumption in two different countries for agricultural purpose from 2000 to 2010. The unit of measurement is cubic meters. Overall, it is evident that Russia consumes slightly higher amount of water than Australia for agriculture purpose and usage is rapidly rising in both countries. In 2000, Russia used […]

See All

Other Topics:

the line graph shows the percentage of people who used five different communication methods between 1998 and 2008.

The line chart represent the percentage of people who used five specific communication tools with span over ten years, from 1998 to 2008. In the very beginning, the biggest part of all communication was through landline service. Started with only 15 percent, then slightly increased in the next years, additionally between 2000 and 2002 had […]

The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words."

The line graph shows the levels of production of the three types of fuel in the UK, namely coal, natural gas and petroleum, from 1981 to 2000. In general, the UK experienced increases in its petroleum and natural gas production, with the former being a clear dominant throughout despite noticeable fluctuations, while coal declined dramatically […]

The graph below shows the number of undergraduate students in thousands in four counties between 1995 and 2015.

The line graph compares figures for the undergraduate student population in four European countries over the period from 1995 to 2015. Overall, student numbers increased in all countries, with the exception of Sweden. Having been the leading country initially, Sweden experienced a significant decrease. Spain recorded the highest numbers by the end of the period, […]

the line graph shows the percentage of people who used five different communication methods between 1998 and 2008.

The line chart represent the percentage of people who used five specific communication tools with span over ten years, from 1998 to 2008. In the very beginning, the biggest part of all communication was through landline service. Started with only 15 percent, then slightly increased in the next years, additionally between 2000 and 2002 had […]

The line graph below shows the percentage of spending in Turkey from 1960 to 2000

The line graph illustrates the percentage of spending in Turkey, from 1960 to 2000. Overall, it is obsereved that there is significant drop in spending except clothing from 1960 to 2000. There is a huge decline in food spent by turkeish people over the years. In contrast, it is noticed that thre is a slight […]

The graph shows the amount of fruit produced in four countries (France, Spain, Germany, Turkey) from 1970 to 2010. Summarize the information by reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.

The line chart illustrates how much fruit was produced in different countries (France, Spain, Germany, and Turkey) between 1970 and 2010. Overall, while Turkey and France showed upward trends in fruit production, the opposite patterns were seen in the figures for Spain and Germany. Additionally, by the end of the period, Spain still maintained its […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.