There is a major debate about whether governments have been expanding to use drones to monitor public places and whether they are following the low. While some individuals argue that the benefits of using drone technology outweight the drawback. I believe that monitoring has both advantages and disadventages, but I think it has more negative things. In this essay, I will examine both statements and explain my own opinion.
One reason is that some people think public surveilliance is necessary because following the low is vital. Protecting people from crime is beneficial for their future career. For example, a recent new in my country showed that the number of criminals are increasing. Because of this, politicians must prevent local pr from crime and necessary to think about criminals before they become crininals. Therefore, including drones in public has a positive for people’s daily lives and society.
On the other hand, I strongly maintain that monitering people is awful. Saving individuals’ privacy is crucial. Living with drones allows people with large stress and pressure. For instance, a major university in Japan pursuaded to monitor students’ daily lives. This resurch showed negative trend, such as mental health. Consequently, modern society should secure their private time.
In conclusion, although using drone has some tmporary benefits for people, it ultimately fails to saving stress. Therefore, from my perspective, govenments should monitor only criminals and dahgerous spaces. I think it leads to prevent individuals’ privacy and stress. Furthermore, by introdusing drones, people can live safety and security.