Band 6+: Should space exploration be prioritized over solving immediate terrestrial problems like poverty?

Your pronunciation is quite good. Working on consistency and tackling difficult sounds may enhance clarity.

The answer addresses both sides of the argument, which shows an attempt to provide a balanced view. However, the response is somewhat brief for a Part 3 question, which requires more in-depth development. To improve, avoid focusing solely on general statements and instead expand on the 'why' and 'how.' For example, you could elaborate on the specific consequences of neglecting terrestrial issues or explain how the technological advancements from space exploration might eventually benefit those living in poverty. Additionally, try to use more complex cohesive devices to link your ideas more smoothly.

The answer is coherent and follows a logical progression (stating an opinion, providing reasons, and offering a counter-perspective). However, it is quite brief for a Part 3 question. In Part 3, the examiner expects extended responses. To improve, use more sophisticated cohesive devices beyond 'So' and 'But' (e.g., 'Consequently,' 'On the other hand,' or 'Having said that') and expand on your points with specific examples.

The vocabulary used is accurate but very basic (e.g., 'important,' 'new things,' 'learn new things'). To reach higher bands, you need to use more precise and academic terminology. Instead of 'new things,' try 'scientific breakthroughs' or 'astronomical discoveries.' Instead of 'important,' try 'crucial,' 'paramount,' or 'of significant value.' Instead of 'solving problems,' try 'addressing pressing global issues.'

The grammar is error-free, which is good, but the sentence structures are very simple (Subject + Verb + Object). There is a lack of complex sentence structures such as conditional sentences (e.g., 'If governments were to divert funds from space agencies to social welfare...') or relative clauses. To improve, try to combine ideas using subordinating conjunctions to demonstrate a wider range of grammatical control.