Many feel trapped in a quagmire of dichotomy whether earning a large income should be the ultimate goal of life or using money as a means to achieve greater goals is a significant one. While acknowledging the substantial benefits of money in material aspects, I contend that the advantages of utilizing money to pursue transcendent objectives are more substantial and deserving of consideration. This essay will explore the merits of both aforementioned perspectives, arguing that the latter approach offers greater fulfillment and societal benefits.
On the one hand, there are several main reasons why it is argued that individuals derive a myriad of favorable features when living in a society that regards money as a cornerstone. The key justification behind this statement is that the economic sector operates more actively in regions where finance is highly appraised. Given that the material and physical well-being of the public, especially wage-earners and those in financial need, is guaranteed, the number of outputs produced is likely to increase significantly, contributing to the prosperity of the economy and enhancing tax revenue for the government. As a result, thanks to a wealthy lifestyle, businesses and enterprises are enabled to generate profits as well as provide livelihoods. Apart from that, government expenditures on social issues are expected to be reduced, allowing funds to be redirected toward other social purposes. For instance, investing substantial funds in addressing criminal issues and poverty can contribute to the government coffers, facilitating ongoing improvements in social welfare and meeting the needs of the population. Subsequently, financial burdens on the government’s budget are likely to be alleviated, paving the way for lucrative salaries, better management, and supervision.
On the flip side, I firmly believe that a civilization which promotes the use of currency in pursuing higher goals brings more merits and should be vigorously enhanced. To commence with, it is irrefutable that the tangible worth of money only partially reflects happiness and satisfaction, which are considered the ultimate goals of human existence. In striving for a more harmonious society, governments are purported to allocate a portion of their funds to boost mental health and alleviate psychological issues in order to avoid overlooking talent that can contribute to national development and meet the increasingly high demands of citizens. As a matter of fact, there will certainly be no longer resentment and hostility, and equality of opportunities will be prioritized, setting the stage for globalization. Furthermore, in an era of international integration, utilizing the power of money to foster mutual understanding and cooperation is regarded as more effective and beneficial than simply amassing a substantial amount of revenue without preparation for future plans. It is evident that the exchange of technology, capital, human resources, and expertise between nations not only encourages socio-economic development but also creates more opportunities for individuals and businesses alike. Consequently, both material and spiritual lives are asserted to be enhanced, resulting in a more civilized and profound citizenry.
In conclusion, although I believe that a society which is materially sufficient offers numerous advantages, I am strongly convinced that the assurance of spiritual life holds greater value and should be subject to scrutiny.