Some in individuals are of the opinion that sportsman should have their liberty to perform their chosen sport, especially for high- risk sports. Nevertheless, others, argue that these sports should be imposed a ban from the government in order to safeguard human from being injured. This essay will explore both perspectives before proposing the writer’s opinion on this matter.
On the one hand, there are some reasons explaining why people support athletes to play their favorite sport, aligned with their interest. These sports often require rigorous training and toughness mind, helping Sportsmans build discipline and self- resilience to maintain playing these games. Furthermore, practicing promotes metal resilience and physical- well-being, which can benefit players to overcome challenges emerging in today working environment. Eventually, these venture sports are often characterized by its high levels of hazardousness, this trade can greatly support players’ financial stabilities, especially for those who already well- trained these sports.
On the other hand, opponents of the previous view claim that there should be a definitive action from the government to handle the unexpected accident derived from risky sports. Evidently, there are no less situations these sports causing mortality and mobility for athletes, Somes may suffer from severe pain for the rest of their life. Let take climbing mountain as an example, the group of 15 people climbed to Everest Mountain have been lost for approximately 10 years. Moreover, joining in these games require a bunch of insurance and high- end equipment to project human from being injured, leading to the ignorance buying these essential tools, especially for low-income sport eagers.
In conclusion, while safety concerns are valid, I