Experimental Design Procedure For Final Year Projects in Chemistry - IELTS Listening Answers & Explanations
From Succeed in IELTS Academic Listening Test 4 · Part 3 · Questions 21–30
Audio
Questions
Questions 21–25 Matching
Which person has the following opinion about the incident in 2008?
Write the correct letter, A, B or C next to questions 21 - 25.
A. Laura
B. Jamie
C. Denise
Questions 26–30 Flow Chart Completion
Complete the flow-chart below.
Choose SIX answers from the box and write the correct letter, A - G, next to questions 26 - 30.
A. librarian | B. professor | C. RA
D. laboratory technician | E. safety officer | F. student
G. laboratory supervisor
Experimental Design Procedure For Final Year Projects in Chemistry
Student submits experiment safety assessment form to laboratory supervisor
↓
Laboratory supervisor reviews the application (copy to Professor)
↓
26 makes a recommendation to the professor
↓
27 approves experimental design
No → 28 notified of safety concerns → (re-submits form to laboratory supervisor)
Yes ↓
29 helps student write up experimental safety procedure guidelines
↓
30 approves safety procedure guidelines
No → (re-writes guidelines)
Yes ↓
Experiment begins
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q21 | C | L: Yes, exactly! So you've heard about that already, Denise? D: Professor Mills told us about it on the first day of class. It was hilarious | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Laura talking to Denise about the incident, and Denise responds that she learned about it from Professor Mills and thought it was extremely funny. Answer Explanation: The answer choice C means that Denise is the person who thought the 2008 incident was very funny. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Denise (labeled as D) reacts to the story about the 2008 science block evacuation by stating, "It was hilarious!". The word "hilarious" is a direct synonym for "very funny". |
| Q22 | B | Yeah, but I reckon some people must have gotten into a lot of trouble | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Jamie saying that he believes certain people must have experienced big problems or punishment because of what happened. Answer Explanation: The answer B means that Jamie is the person who believes that people must have faced serious trouble or punishment. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Jamie (J) shares his opinion about the 2008 incident by saying, "Yeah, but I reckon some people must have gotten into a lot of trouble." The phrase "I reckon" expresses his personal opinion, and "gotten into a lot of trouble" means the same thing as facing "serious consequences." |
| Q23 | A | To be honest it was mortifyingly embarrassing for the chemistry department, because, not only could no one identify what the toxic substance was, but also at the time of the incident, no one was actually authorized to be carrying out experiments with any toxic substances whatsoever | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Laura explaining that the department felt deeply ashamed and embarrassed about the incident because nobody knew what the chemical was and no student was permitted to work with dangerous chemicals at that time. Answer Explanation: The answer "A" means that Laura is the person who believes the 2008 incident made people feel embarrassed. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is Laura (A) because she specifically states that the 2008 chemical incident was extremely shameful and uncomfortable for the department. She uses the words "mortifyingly embarrassing", which directly matches the idea in the question that "it caused embarrassment." |
| Q24 | A | everyone was utterly shocked that someone of college age would do something so childish and irresponsible | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Laura saying that everyone was very surprised that a university-aged student acted in such a childish (immature) and careless way. Answer Explanation: The answer "A" means that Laura is the person who thought the incident in 2008 was very childish or immature. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Laura (speaker L) describes the 2008 incident where a bored student mixed random powders. She states that people were shocked that a college student would do something so "childish and irresponsible." In English, the word "childish" is a direct synonym for "immature." Therefore, this opinion belongs to Laura. |
| Q25 | B | J: So, we're basically being punished because some other student was irresponsible | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Jamie asking Laura whether the students are receiving a punishment because a past student acted irresponsibly. Answer Explanation: The answer B means that Jamie is the person who feels that the students are being punished because of the incident. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Jamie asks if they are essentially being punished as a result of another student's irresponsible behavior in the past. In the audio, the speaker tagged with "J" (Jamie) explicitly uses the phrase "basically being punished", matching the idea in the prompt. |
| Q26 | G | The laboratory supervisor will eventually make a recommendation to your professor about whether the experiment can go ahead, requires modifications, or may not be done | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that the laboratory supervisor is the person who gives advice or a recommendation to the professor about whether the student's experiment can happen. Answer Explanation: The answer G refers to the "laboratory supervisor". Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is G because the speaker clearly states that after reviewing the form, the "laboratory supervisor" will make a recommendation to the professor regarding the experiment. This directly matches the flow-chart step "makes a recommendation to the professor". |
| Q27 | B | Next, your professor will either approve the project, or not | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states clearly that the professor is the person who decides to approve or reject the student's project. Answer Explanation: The answer is B, which stands for the professor. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because the flow-chart asks who approves the experimental design after the laboratory supervisor makes a recommendation. According to Laura's explanation, once the laboratory supervisor makes a recommendation to the professor, the next step is that the professor decides whether to approve the project or not. |
| Q28 | F | If your professor does not approve the project due to safety concerns, then you, the student, will be notified and you'll begin the process over again by submitting a new safety assessment form that takes into account those troublesome safety issues | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states that if the professor rejects the project because of safety problems, the student will be informed and will have to fill out and send a new safety form. Answer Explanation: The answer is option F, which refers to the "student". Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because Laura explains what happens if the professor does not approve the project. She states: "If your professor does not approve the project due to safety concerns, then you, the student, will be notified and you'll begin the process over again by submitting a new safety assessment form...". This matches the flow-chart step where a "No" decision leads to the "student" being notified of safety concerns before re-submitting the form. |
| Q29 | C | Well, after your professor approves your project, he'll assign an RA to help you write the experimental safety procedure guidelines | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that when the professor accepts the student's project, a research assistant (RA) will be chosen to help the student write the rules for doing the experiment safely. Answer Explanation: The answer C refers to an "RA" (research assistant), who helps the student write the safety procedure guidelines. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Laura explains what happens after the professor approves the project. She states that the professor will "assign an RA to help you write the experimental safety procedure guidelines." In the flow chart, the step directly following project approval by the professor is "helps student write up experimental safety procedure guidelines," which directly points to the RA. |
| Q30 | D | Finally, once that's written, you'll give it to the laboratory technician, that's me, for approval. If I approve it, then you can begin your experiment | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript clearly states that after writing the guidelines, the student must give them to the laboratory technician to get approval before starting the experiment. Answer Explanation: The answer is D, which stands for the "laboratory technician". Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the flow-chart asks who approves the student's safety procedure guidelines right before the experiment can begin. In the recording, Laura explains that once the guidelines are written, students must hand them to the "laboratory technician" (herself) for approval. When she approves them, the experiment can begin. Therefore, the person who approves the safety procedure guidelines is the laboratory technician (D). |
Transcript
L: Hi there, I'm Laura. I'm the laboratory technician for these chemistry labs, and Professor Mills has asked me to explain the procedure that you'll all have to go through to get your final year projects approved. Most of the procedure involves safety concerns, which we take very seriously. We don't want any uncontrolled explosions, no fires, and definitely no incidents with toxic gases.
D: You mean like what happened in 2008 when the whole science block had to be evacuated?
L: Yes, exactly! So you've heard about that already, Denise?
D: Professor Mills told us about it on the first day of class. It was hilarious!
J: Yeah, but I reckon some people must have gotten into a lot of trouble.
L: To be honest it was mortifyingly embarrassing for the chemistry department, because, not only could no one identify what the toxic substance was, but also at the time of the incident, no one was actually authorized to be carrying out experiments with any toxic substances whatsoever. It turned out a student had got a bit bored and had decided to do some spontaneous experimentation by mixing up some random powders that were lying around. This is actually incredibly foolish, because there are some extremely dangerous substances in the laboratory stores, and everyone was utterly shocked that someone of college age would do something so childish and irresponsible. And, in effect, this incident was the reason we developed the safety procedure that each of you must now go through before we let you loose in the laboratory to do your final year project. The procedure will force you to really be aware of safety issues, so just in case, at the moment, any of you think it would be a laugh to mix up some colourful substances or light things on fire for no reason, by the time you've worked your way through the procedure, you'll at least pause for a second thought; at least, we would hope so!
J: So, uh, can I ask something?
L: Yes, Jamie?
J: So, we're basically being punished because some other student was irresponsible?
L: Actually, the approval process isn't as bad as that. We can't really call it a punishment! It seems really very long and cumbersome at first, because you'll have to get a lot of different tasks stamped for approval by a lot of different staff members, and I'm sure most of them will have various concerns and suggestions. But my aim today is to break down the process, and explain all the different steps to you, so that it doesn't seem quite so bad.
L: All right, let's get started. As I said before, a number of different staff members will be giving you suggestions, and they may not always agree, so just to keep things clear, you should remember that the laboratory supervisor has the final say about whether or not an experiment may be done here, in our laboratory. Your professor has the final say on whether you can do a particular experiment for your project, provided it's approved by the laboratory, and I've got the final say on how it may be done.
So, the first step is that you will fill out this safety assessment form. You will have to have a fairly clear idea of your experiment, because you'll need to list all the chemicals you'll be using, the quantities you'll be using for each one, and the nature of the reactions that you'll carry out. You'll also be required to provide a week-by-week schedule so that we can be sure that whatever substances you're working with won't prove to be incendiary if they get mixed up with whatever the person next to you on the bench is getting up to. Really, for most of you this assessment form will be quite straightforward because you're simply not going to be working with anything very dangerous. But for some of you, particularly if you are working with any volatile substances, it could be a bit more complicated. You might have to justify the use of certain substances, or only be allowed to use them on particular days.
Now then, after you've filled out your safety assessment form, and given a copy to your professor, you will submit it to the laboratory supervisor, and he'll review it. This could take a couple of weeks so do it early, don't leave it to the last minute; he's a busy man. The laboratory supervisor will eventually make a recommendation to your professor about whether the experiment can go ahead, requires modifications, or may not be done. Next, your professor will either approve the project, or not. If your professor does not approve the project due to safety concerns, then you, the student, will be notified and you'll begin the process over again by submitting a new safety assessment form that takes into account those troublesome safety issues. Is everyone with me so far?
J: Uh..... I have a question.
L: Yes, Jamie?
J: Er, so if we have to wait weeks for the laboratory supervisor to give his approval, and then we have to re-do the form, uh, we're going to be quite behind our classmates who got approval on their first go. That's a bit unfair, isn't it? I mean, some people are going to have an advantage of several weeks over other people.
L: Well, you needn't really worry about getting behind at this stage; after all, you'll have six months to work on your final project. And you'll only get a two-week block of laboratory time, anyway, so there's time to wait for the laboratory supervisor, provided you get started promptly and don't leave it all to the last two months! Also, don't forget that this is only one step; there are plenty of other steps for other students to get hung up on farther down the line. It will all balance out.
D: But, um, Laura, what if our projects aren't approved?
L: Then you'll come up with another one. Don't get too attached to your project in the beginning. Projects get turned down. Let's see, last year I think only 15 projects got approval on their first go.
J: Out of how many?
L: Out of .... about ...... 45, I think; there are less of you this year. But still, be prepared to come up with an alternative project. There are plenty of people to help you if you need ideas; your professor, his RAs, even your fellow students. And don't forget that in the first months of your project the library will be your second home, and the librarians will be your greatest friends.
D: Laura, what's an RA?
L: RA stands for research assistant, like Jess, over there, in the lab coat. Hi, Jess! Now, once your professor has approved your project, you will need to write up a set of experiment safety procedure guidelines. This will include all the practical steps you'll take to keep safe, and exactly what you'll do if you have a spill or some such thing.
D: How will we know all this? We've got no experience in the laboratory.
L: Well, after your professor approves your project, he'll assign an RA to help you write the experimental safety procedure guidelines. You won't be on your own. Finally, once that's written, you'll give it to the laboratory technician, that's me, for approval. If I approve it, then you can begin your experiment. If there are problems, we'll sit down together and talk about it, then you and your assigned RA will come up with a way of making your experiment completely safe to conduct, you'll re-do the guidelines, and give it to me again, until it's approved. But the RAs know what they're doing so I don't expect there will be too many problems. Ok? Any questions?
