Karina and Mike’s Assigments - IELTS Listening Answers & Explanations
From Official Cambridge Guide to IELTS Academic Listening Test 6 · Part 3 · Questions 21–30
Audio
Questions
Questions 21–26 Multiple Choice (One Answer)
Choose the correct letter, A, B or C.
Questions 27–30 Sentence Completion
Answer the questions below.
Write NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS for each answer.
- What TWO biofuel-related problems do Mike and Karina decide to focus on in the last section of their presentation?
• 27
- • 28
- Which two sources of biofuel do Mike and Karina say are being tried out?
• 29
- • 30
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q21 | B | I thought we could start by asking our audience what car engines were first designed to run on fossil fuels or biofuels | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Mike proposing a way to begin the presentation. He suggests asking a question about which fuel car engines used when they were first made. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Mike wants to start the talk by showing that people used biofuels in car engines before they started using fossil fuels. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because Mike suggests starting the presentation with a question about which fuel was used first in history. He wants the audience to realize that even though everyone thinks of cars as using fossil fuels now, this was not the case at the beginning. Karina then mentions that early engines used oils from corn and peanuts, which are biofuels. This confirms that Mike's plan is to point out that biofuels were the original fuel source. |
| Q22 | C | It's interesting - the other students would appreciate it, but different biofuels use different processes and if we give a general description, there's a risk we'll get it wrong, and then the tutor might mark us down | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Karina explaining that because different biofuels are made using different steps, a broad description might be wrong. She fears they will make a mistake and lose points on their presentation. Answer Explanation: The answer means Karina is worried that their explanation of how ethanol is made might be incorrect or have mistakes. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Karina points out that because there are many ways to produce different biofuels, giving a general explanation might lead to errors. She specifically says there is a 'risk' they will get the information 'wrong,' which matches the idea of not providing an 'accurate description.' She wants to avoid this so their teacher (tutor) doesn't give them a lower grade. |
| Q23 | B | Karina: Yes, but some critics have suggested that the production of corn ethanol uses up more fossil fuel energy than the biofuel energy it eventually produces. For that reason, I'd say it was more harmful to the environment. Mike: I see what you mean. You're probably right | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Karina explaining that corn fuel is bad for the earth because it takes a lot of energy to make. Mike agrees with her opinion, which means they both see corn as the most harmful (least environmentally friendly) choice among the biofuels mentioned. Answer Explanation: The answer is corn. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is corn because Karina argues that this source of fuel is worse for nature than sugar cane or canola. She explains that making corn fuel uses more energy from fossil fuels than it creates. Because she says it is 'more harmful to the environment' and Mike agrees by saying she is 'probably right,' corn is identified as the least environmentally friendly option. |
| Q24 | A | The problem is that it still has to be transported by trucks or rail because they haven't built any pipelines to move it | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that the main issue is how the fuel is moved from place to place. Since the US lacks specific pipes (pipelines) for this, it is forced to use trucks and trains, which holds the industry back. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the United States does not have the necessary pipes or systems (infrastructure) to move the ethanol fuel to different places easily. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Mike specifically identifies a single key problem: the lack of infrastructure. He explains that because there are no pipelines, the fuel must be moved by slower and more expensive ways like trucks or trains. Using synonyms or related terms: 'transported' in the text matches 'transporting' in the answer, and 'pipelines' are a type of 'infrastructure'. |
| Q25 | C | Which is great, and the industry in Brazil employs a huge number of people, but is it sustainable? I mean, as the population grows, and there are more vehicles on the roads and there's more machinery, surely they can't depend so much on sugar cane | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Karina questioning if the current way Brazil makes fuel can last. She worries that as more people use cars and machines, sugar cane might not be enough to provide for everyone. Answer Explanation: The answer means that Karina is not sure if Brazil can keep using sugar cane to get enough energy for all its needs in the future. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because Karina asks if the energy situation in Brazil is 'sustainable,' which means she is questioning if it can continue for a long time. She mentions that as the number of people, cars, and machines grows, they might not be able to 'depend' (rely) only on sugar cane anymore because there is a 'limit' to how much land they can use. This shows her doubt that sugar cane will be enough to meet the country's future energy needs. |
| Q26 | C | Well, we probably won't see an increase in biofuel use - I mean, they won't replace fossil fuels until we can find ways to produce them cheaply and quickly and with less cost to the environment. Mike making sure they require minimal energy to produce. Karina: Exactly |
Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Karina and Mike agreeing that for biofuels to start replacing old fuels, the making process must be faster, cheaper, better for the environment, and use very little energy. Answer Explanation: The answer means that for biofuels to become more popular, the way they are made needs to use less energy and be better for nature. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because both Karina and Mike agree that biofuels will only be used more if the production process is improved. Karina mentions that they need to find ways to make biofuels cheaply and with less damage to the environment. Mike then specifically states that they should make sure these fuels "require minimal energy to produce." Using "minimal energy" to make something is a synonym for being "energy-efficient." |
| Q27 | global hunger / hunger | Well, we've already had a look at different types of pollution in the first section, so we can leave that out, but the biggest issue related to biofuels is that land is now being used to grow biofuels crops - and that's contributing to global hunger | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Mike explaining that since land is used to grow plants for fuel, it contributes to the problem of people in many countries being hungry. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to global hunger, which is the problem of many people around the world not having enough food to eat. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is global hunger because Mike identifies it as the 'biggest issue' for the final part of their presentation. He explains that using land to grow plants for fuel instead of food crops is causing this problem. Karina agrees, saying it is wrong to use corn for cars when people cannot afford food. |
| Q28 | pollution | The other thing is that in some countries, the way that biofuel crops are grown and harvested still produces a great deal of pollution – really damaging to the atmosphere | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Karina explaining that in some places, the process of growing and collecting plants for fuel makes the air very dirty and harmful. Answer Explanation: The answer is pollution, which refers to the harmful things put into the air or environment during the production of biofuels. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is pollution because, during their planning for the final part of the presentation, Karina mentions that growing and harvesting biofuel crops causes a lot of it. She explains that it is very bad for the atmosphere (the air), and Mike agrees that they should talk about this issue. Keywords like "produces a great deal of pollution" and "damaging to the atmosphere" show that this is one of the problems they choose to focus on. |
| Q29 | wood | Some companies are exploring the possibility of using wood, and seeing how that can be used to make ethanol | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows that some businesses are investigating if they can turn wood into a type of fuel called ethanol. Answer Explanation: The answer mentions wood as one of the new materials scientists and companies are testing to create biofuel. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is wood because, towards the end of the conversation, Mike explicitly mentions that some companies are looking into using wood to produce ethanol (a type of biofuel). This fits the category of new sources that are currently being tried out or explored as alternatives to food crops like corn or sugar cane. |
| Q30 | grasses / grass | Mike: I read that. And grasses. They're another plant that researchers are investigating as a biofuel | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript shows Mike noting that grasses are being looked at by scientists (researchers) as a possible way to make fuel. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to a type of plant that scientists are currently studying to determine if it can be used to produce fuel. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is chosen because Mike explicitly mentions 'grasses' as a plant that researchers are currently 'investigating' for use as a biofuel. This conversation happens at the end of the transcript when the speakers are discussing new, potential sources of energy that do not compete with food crops. |
Transcript
Karina: Hi, Mike. How's it going?
Mike: Actually, I was up last night with an assignment so - yeah, I'm tired, but I guess we'd better sort this presentation out.
Karina: Well, we've done enough background reading, but I think we need to organise exactly what we're going to say about biofuels during the presentation, and the order.
Mike: I thought we could start by asking our audience what car engines were first designed to run on fossil fuels or biofuels.
Karina: Nice idea.
Mike: Yes, when most people think about cars and fuel, they think about all the carbon dioxide that's produced, but they don't realise that that wasn't always the case.
Karina: You're probably right. The earliest car engines ran on fuel made from corn and peanut oil, didn't they?
Mike: Yes. The manufacturers used the corn and peanut oil and turned them into a kind of very pure alcohol.
Karina: You mean ethanol?
Mike: Yes. In fact, most biofuels are still based on ethanol. Actually, I've got some notes here about the process of turning plant-matter into ethanol - the chemical reactions and the fermentation stages and ...
Karina: It's interesting - the other students would appreciate it, but different biofuels use different processes and if we give a general description, there's a risk we'll get it wrong, and then the tutor might mark us down. I'd rather we focus on the environmental issues.
Mike: Fair enough. So, um the main plants that are used for biofuel production now are sugar cane, corn
Karina: And canola. Of all of them, canola is probably the least harmful because machines that use it don't produce as much carbon monoxide.
Mike: Sugar cane seems to be controversial. It doesn't require as much fertilizer as corn does to grow, but when they burn the sugar cane fields, that releases loads of greenhouse gases.
Karina: Yes, but some critics have suggested that the production of corn ethanol uses up more fossil fuel energy than the biofuel energy it eventually produces. For that reason, I'd say it was more harmful to the environment.
Mike: I see what you mean. You're probably right. It's interesting how everyone saw the biofuel industry as the answer to our energy problems, but in some ways, biofuels have created new problems.
Karina: Well, in the USA, I wouldn't say that farmers are having problems - the biofuel industry for them has turned out to be really profitable.
Mike: I think, though, that even in the USA, ethanol is still only used as an additive to gasoline, or petrol. The problem is that it still has to be transported by trucks or rail because they haven't built any pipelines to move it. Once they do, it'll be cheaper and the industry might move forward.
Karina: That'll have to happen one day. At least the government are in favour of biofuel development.
Mike: Yes. But Brazil's probably in the lead as far as biofuels are concerned - they've got to the point where they don't need to import any oil now.
Karina: Which is great, and the industry in Brazil employs a huge number of people, but is it sustainable? I mean, as the population grows, and there are more vehicles on the roads and there's more machinery, surely they can't depend so much on sugar cane? At some point, there has to be a limit on how much land can be used for sugar cane production - certainly if you want to preserve natural habitats and native wildlife.
Mike: I think that whatever problems Brazil's facing now the same will be true for any country - you have to weigh up the pros and cons.
Karina: Well, we probably won't see an increase in biofuel use - I mean, they won't replace fossil fuels until we can find ways to produce them cheaply and quickly and with less cost to the environment.
Mike: ... making sure they require minimal energy to produce.
Karina: Exactly. And in a way that means they have to cost less than fossil fuels - certainly when you're filling up your car.
Mike: Yes, and whatever other kind of engines use fossil fuels at the moment.
[pause]
Karina: Alright, so in the last section of the presentation, what problems are we focusing on?
Mike: Well, we've already had a look at different types of pollution in the first section, so we can leave that out, but the biggest issue related to biofuels is that land is now being used to grow biofuels crops - and that's contributing to global hunger.
Karina: Indeed. It doesn't seem right we're using corn to run cars when people can't afford to buy it to eat. Yes, let's talk about that. The other thing is that in some countries, the way that biofuel crops are grown and harvested still produces a great deal of pollution – really damaging to the atmosphere.
Mike: OK, that's definitely an issue we should look at.
Karina: Let's not finish on a negative note, though. Why don't we talk about the potential new sources of biofuel so rather than corn and sugar cane what other plants could be used?
Mike: Good. Some companies are exploring the possibility of using wood, and seeing how that can be used to make ethanol.
Karina: Yes, and algae is another possibility. You can grow it in any water and it absorbs pollutants, too.
Mike: I read that. And grasses. They're another plant that researchers are investigating as a biofuel.
Karina: And these kind of plants aren't used as food, which is why ...
