The History Of British Pottery - IELTS Listening Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Trainer 1 Academic Listening Test 3 · Part 4 · Questions 31–40
Audio
Questions
Questions 31–35 Sentence Completion
Complete the sentences below.
Write ONLY ONE WORD for each answer.
- In the eighteenth century, the 31 still determined how most people made a living.
- In the ground were minerals which supported the many 32 of the region.
- Since the late sixteenth century the French settlers had made 33.
- In Cheshire 34 was mined and transported on the river Mersey.
- Potters worked in a few 35 situated on the small hills of North Staffordshire.
Questions 36–40 Note Completion
Complete the notes below.
Write ONE WORD for each answer.
Pottery notes
Earthenware
advantages:
- potters used 36 clay
- saved money on 37
disadvantages:
- needed two firings in the kiln to be 38
- fragility led to high 39 during manufacturing
Stoneware
- more expensive but better
- made from a 40 of clay and flint
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q31 | land | Now, at that period the majority of the population, whatever their station in life, as you might say, were dependent for their living, in one way or another, not on the geographical location of where they lived, but on the physical characteristics of the actual land they lived on | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that during that time (the eighteenth century), almost everyone relied on the natural features of the ground (the physical characteristics of the actual land) to survive and earn money. Answer Explanation: The answer explains that the ground people lived on decided what kind of work they could do to make money. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'land' because the lecturer says that in the eighteenth century, most people's jobs relied on the physical parts of the ground they lived on. Whether they were rich people selling coal or farmers growing food, their money came from the earth itself. The phrase 'dependent for their living' in the text means the same thing as 'determined how most people made a living' in the question. |
| Q32 | industries / trades | And besides these groups, and the less affluent ones, the deposits of iron ore and lead, the limestone and flint and the brown and yellow clays also sustained the numerous industries in the area | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that things found in the ground, like metals and different types of rock and clay, helped keep many local businesses (industries) running. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the different types of businesses or jobs that make things in a specific area. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is industries (or trades) because the lecturer explains that materials found in the earth, such as iron, lead, and clay, 'sustained' or supported many businesses in that region. The word 'numerous' in the transcript matches the meaning of 'many,' and 'sustained' means 'supported.' |
| Q33 | glass | For example, there were immigrants from France who came as early as the late sixteenth century and they were producers of glass | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript says that people who moved from France to this area at the end of the 1500s were makers of glass. Answer Explanation: The answer is glass, which is a hard, clear material often used to make things like windows, mirrors, or bottles. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is glass because the speaker explains that people from France moved to the Midlands area during the late 1500s (the sixteenth century) specifically to work in the glass industry. In the talk, 'immigrants' refers to these French settlers, and 'producers' means they were the ones making the product. |
| Q34 | salt | And of course, in Cheshire men dug the salt, as we still do nowadays even, which in that era was sent downriver to the estuary of the Mersey | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states that in the area called Cheshire, workers pulled salt out of the earth and then moved it using the Mersey river. Answer Explanation: The answer is salt, which is a substance found in the ground and used for food. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is salt because the text says that in the region of Cheshire, people dug salt out of the ground. It also mentions that this salt was then sent down the river Mersey. In the context of the sentence, 'dug' is a synonym for 'mined,' and being 'sent downriver' means it was 'transported.' |
| Q35 | villages | in a handful of North Staffordshire villages dotted along the low hills | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript says that the people who made pottery lived in a few small towns, called villages, which were spread out along the hills in the North Staffordshire area. Answer Explanation: The answer 'villages' refers to small groups of houses or tiny towns located in the countryside. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'villages' because the lecturer specifically identifies these small communities as the places where potters lived and worked using the local clay. The transcript mentions they were 'dotted along the low hills' of North Staffordshire, which matches the sentence description of Being 'situated on the small hills'. Keywords to note are 'potters' (the workers), 'North Staffordshire' (the location), and 'villages' (the specific type of settlement). |
| Q36 | local | This was because it could be made from local clay without any complicated processing or added materials | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that earthenware pottery was made using clay found nearby, which meant the potters didn't need to add extra things or do difficult work to prepare it. Answer Explanation: The answer 'local' means that the material used to make the pottery was found right in the same area where the potters lived and worked. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'local' because the lecturer explains that earthenware was cheap to produce. One reason for this low cost was that potters did not have to pay for expensive materials from far away; they simply used the clay that was available in their own neighborhood. |
| Q37 | fuel | From the potter's point of view there was another reason for its cheapness. This was that it could be fired in simple ovens, or kilns, and at relatively low temperatures, so he didn't have to spend so much money on fuel to achieve the necessary heat | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript says that earthenware was inexpensive because it was cooked at a lower temperature. This allowed the potter to save money because they did not have to buy as much fuel to keep the oven hot. Answer Explanation: The answer "fuel" is the material (like wood or coal) that is burned to make fire and heat for the ovens. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the description of earthenware pottery. The speaker explains that earthenware was a low-cost product. One reason it was cheap for the potter to make is that the ovens did not need to be extremely hot. Because the temperature was low, the potter did not need to buy a large amount of burning material, or fuel, which saved money. |
| Q38 | waterproof | On the other hand, after one firing in the kiln, the problem with earthenware was that it remained porous so had limited usefulness. So for most purposes it had to go back in the kiln for a second firing before it became waterproof | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that after being baked once, earthenware had tiny holes that made it soak up water. To make it useful, it had to be baked again (a second firing) until it could hold water properly. Answer Explanation: The answer "waterproof" refers to a material that does not allow liquids, like water, to pass through it. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "waterproof" because the lecturer describes a specific problem with earthenware after its first heating (firing). Even though it was cheap, it was "porous," meaning it would let water soak through. To fix this and make it useful for things like jugs or bowls, the potter had to heat it in the oven (kiln) a second time. This second step was necessary to ensure the material would keep liquids inside. |
| Q39 | wastage / waste | And another thing was that it was extremely breakable - I mean, before it had even been sold. I suppose the potter wouldn't have minded so much if people just had to keep coming back for more every time they broke a jug or whatever! - but it was very inconvenient because it meant there was a lot of wastage in the course of the manufacturing process | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript states that because this kind of pottery was very easy to break ('extremely breakable'), it resulted in many lost items ('wastage') during the time it was being made ('the manufacturing process'). Answer Explanation: The answer is 'wastage' or 'waste', which refers to items that are lost or thrown away because they were broken or ruined while being made. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is based on the lecturer's description of earthenware pottery. He explains that earthenware breaks very easily (it is fragile/breakable). This fragility caused a lot of things to be lost or thrown out ('wastage') while the pots were still being made ('in the course of the manufacturing process'). |
| Q40 | mixture / mix / combination | Now, for this, the potter used a slightly more expensive raw material, which was made by combining clay and flint and this mixture was fired at a far higher heat, with the result that the ingredients vitrified, that is to say, in effect the whole thing became glassy and because of this it was non-porous, and naturally, this was regarded as a great advance | Excerpt/Transcript Explanation: The transcript explains that to make stoneware, potters took two things—clay and flint—and put them together to form a 'mixture'. This mixture was then heated much more than regular pottery to make it more like glass and waterproof. Answer Explanation: The answer means a single material that is made by putting two or more different ingredients together. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer describes how stoneware was produced. In the transcript, the speaker explains that potters joined clay and flint together to create a new material. The text specifically uses the word 'mixture' to describe this result. The words 'mix' and 'combination' are synonyms that a listener might use to describe two things being joined into one. |
Transcript
Lecturer: Thank you for coming to this series of talks. Before I talk in detail about the experiments and innovations of the British ceramicists, I'd like to give you a summary of the social and manufacturing background in which they lived and worked.
So, we're talking about England, or more specifically, the region known as 'The Midlands', and we need to go back, mainly to the eighteenth century and, briefly, even earlier, to put it in a global context.
Now, at that period the majority of the population, whatever their station in life, as you might say, were dependent for their living, in one way or another, not on the geographical location of where they lived, but on the physical characteristics of the actual land they lived on. This is true, whether we're talking about the aristocracy, the owners of great estates, who incidentally had no snobbery about the concept of making money from all the reserves of coal, or timber, or stone on their rolling acres, or the farmers making a fat living from the rich soils. And besides these groups, and the less affluent ones, the deposits of iron ore and lead, the limestone and flint and the brown and yellow clays also sustained the numerous industries in the area.
It's important to recognise that it was already an industrial region, and had been so for centuries. There were many Midland trades, some of them indigenous, some of them not. For example, there were immigrants from France who came as early as the late sixteenth century and they were producers of glass. A century later, there is plenty of evidence that the variety of trades was enormous: there was brewing in Burton-on-Trent; silk-weaving and ribbon-making near Coventry; framework knitting around Nottingham. And of course, in Cheshire men dug the salt, as we still do nowadays even, which in that era was sent downriver to the estuary of the Mersey.
Now, among these well-established trades, one of the oldest of the local crafts was pottery. As you will probably be aware, ceramics has always been a mix of science, design and skill, and a good potter is in a sense an experimental chemist, trying out new mixes and glazes, and needing to be alert to the impact of changes of temperature on different types of clay. For two hundred years, up to the time we are concerned with, potters had been making butterpots and pitchers and patterned plates, using the clay which was plentiful in the area where they lived - in a handful of North Staffordshire villages dotted along the low hills.
Now I want to explain a little about the industrial processes which had preceded the great breakthrough in Germany in 1708. That's when the formula for porcelain was discovered, a secret that had been held in China for a thousand years. In the Midlands, in England, as elsewhere, there had basically been two kinds of pottery. The first was known, is still known, as 'earthenware'.
Now this was a bit rough and ready, but it was deservedly popular for several reasons. To start with, it was relatively cheap, so it could be used by most households. This was because it could be made from local clay without any complicated processing or added materials. From the potter's point of view there was another reason for its cheapness. This was that it could be fired in simple ovens, or kilns, and at relatively low temperatures, so he didn't have to spend so much money on fuel to achieve the necessary heat. On the other hand, after one firing in the kiln, the problem with earthenware was that it remained porous so had limited usefulness. So for most purposes it had to go back in the kiln for a second firing before it became waterproof.
And another thing was that it was extremely breakable - I mean, before it had even been sold. I suppose the potter wouldn't have minded so much if people just had to keep coming back for more every time they broke a jug or whatever! - but it was very inconvenient because it meant there was a lot of wastage in the course of the manufacturing process.
Anyway, for all these reasons, if people could afford it, and that would be all but the very poor, they would buy stoneware, a much tougher product.
Now, for this, the potter used a slightly more expensive raw material, which was made by combining clay and flint and this mixture was fired at a far higher heat, with the result that the ingredients vitrified, that is to say, in effect the whole thing became glassy and because of this it was non-porous, and naturally, this was regarded as a great advance.
Well, that's the situation in the eighteenth century. Are there any questions at this stage? OK. So, now we can go on to look at the age of innovation.
