Doctoring Sales - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Cambridge IELTS 06 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 on the following pages.
Doctoring sales
Pharmaceuticals is one of the most profitable industries in North America. But do the drugs industry's sales and marketing strategies go too far?
A A few months ago Kim Schaefer, sales representative of a major global pharmaceutical company, walked into a medical center in New York to bring information and free samples of her company's latest products. That day she was lucky - a doctor was available to see her. 'The last rep offered me a trip to Florida. What do you have?' the physician asked. He was only half joking.
B What was on offer that day was a pair of tickets for a New York musical. But on any given day, what Schaefer can offer is typical for today's drugs rep - a car trunk full of promotional gifts and gadgets, a budget that could buy lunches and dinners for a small country, hundreds of free drug samples and the freedom to give a physician $200 to prescribe her new product to the next six patients who fit the drug's profile. And she also has a few $1,000 honoraria to offer in exchange for doctors' attendance at her company's next educational lecture.
C Selling pharmaceuticals is a daily exercise in ethical judgement. Salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs. They work in an industry highly criticized for its sales and marketing practices, but find themselves in the middle of the age-old chicken-or-egg question - businesses won't use strategies that don't work, so are doctors to blame for the escalating extravagance of pharmaceutical marketing? Or is it the industry's responsibility to decide the boundaries?
D The explosion in the sheer number of salespeople in the field - and the amount of funding used to promote their causes - forces close examination of the pressures, influences and relationships between drug reps and doctors. Salespeople provide much-needed information and education to physicians. In many cases the glossy brochures, article reprints and prescriptions they deliver are primary sources of drug education for healthcare givers. With the huge investment the industry has placed in face-to-face selling, salespeople have essentially become specialists in one drug or group of drugs - a tremendous advantage in getting the attention of busy doctors in need of quick information.
E But the sales push rarely stops in the office. The flashy brochures and pamphlets left by the sales reps are often followed up with meals at expensive restaurants, meetings in warm and sunny places, and an inundation of promotional gadgets. Rarely do patients watch a doctor write with a pen that isn't emblazoned with a drug's name, or see a nurse use a tablet not bearing a pharmaceutical company's logo. Millions of dollars are spent by pharmaceutical companies on promotional products like coffee mugs, shirts, umbrellas, and golf balls. Money well spent? It's hard to tell. 'I've been the recipient of golf balls from one company and I use them, but it doesn't make me prescribe their medicine,' says one doctor. 'I tend to think I'm not influenced by what they give me.'
F Free samples of new and expensive drugs might be the single most effective way of getting doctors and patients to become loyal to a product. Salespeople hand out hundreds of dollars' worth of samples each week - $7.2 billion worth of them in one year. Though few comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe. A total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns - the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense and prescribe drugs that differed from their preferred drug choice.
G The bottom line is that pharmaceutical companies as a whole invest more in marketing than they do in research and development. And patients are the ones who pay - in the form of sky-rocketing prescription prices - for every pen that's handed out, every free theatre ticket, and every steak dinner eaten. In the end the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit and will continue to find new ways to increase sales. But as the medical world continues to grapple with what's acceptable and what's not, it is clear that companies must continue to be heavily scrutinized for their sales and marketing strategies.
Questions
Questions 1–7 Matching Headings
Reading Passage 1 has seven paragraphs, A-G.
Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below.
i. Not all doctors are persuaded
ii. Choosing the best offers
iii. Who is responsible for the increase in promotions?
iv. Fighting the drug companies
v. An example of what doctors expect from drug companies
vi. Gifts include financial incentives
vii. Research shows that promotion works
viii. The high costs of research
ix. The positive side of drugs promotion
x. Who really pays for doctors' free gifts?
Questions 8–13 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 1?
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | v | 'The last rep offered me a trip to Florida. What do you have?' the physician asked | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows a doctor asking a sales person for gifts. He mentions a trip he was offered before to show that he expects to get something from the new person too. Answer Explanation: The answer is heading v, which states that Paragraph A provides a specific instance showing what doctors now anticipate receiving from pharmaceutical companies. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is v because Paragraph A describes a real-life situation where a doctor asks a sales representative for a gift, just as he had received a trip from a previous salesperson. This interaction serves as an example of how doctors have come to expect rewards or incentives for meeting with 'reps' (sales representatives). The question 'What do you have?' indicates that the doctor is looking for an offer or a gift. |
| Q2 | vi | But on any given day, what Schaefer can offer is typical for today's drugs rep - a car trunk full of promotional gifts and gadgets, a budget that could buy lunches and dinners for a small country, hundreds of free drug samples and the freedom to give a physician $200 to prescribe her new product to the next six patients who fit the drug's profile. And she also has a few $1,000 honoraria to offer in exchange for doctors' attendance at her company's next educational lecture | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that salespeople have many things to give to doctors. This includes regular gifts, but also specific amounts of money—like $200 for using a drug or $1,000 for going to a lecture—which act as financial rewards. Answer Explanation: The answer vi means that the paragraph talks about gifts that include money or cash rewards to encourage someone to do something. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is vi because Paragraph B describes the variety of things a pharmaceutical sales representative can offer to doctors. While it mentions small gifts and meals, it specifically highlights cash payments, such as giving a doctor $200 to prescribe a specific drug or $1,000 for attending a meeting. These payments are examples of 'financial incentives' used to influence doctors. |
| Q3 | iii | businesses won't use strategies that don't work, so are doctors to blame for the escalating extravagance of pharmaceutical marketing? Or is it the industry's responsibility to decide the boundaries | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage asks whether doctors are the reason drug companies spend so much on marketing because they respond to it, or if the companies themselves should be responsible for deciding what is acceptable. Answer Explanation: The answer 'iii' means the main idea of Paragraph C is figuring out who is at fault for the growing amount of gifts and sales tricks used by drug companies. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer 'iii' matches the content of Paragraph C because it focuses on an 'ethical judgement' regarding who should be held accountable for marketing tactics. The paragraph asks a 'chicken-or-egg question' about whether doctors are to 'blame' for the 'escalating extravagance' (the increase in gift-giving) or if the pharmaceutical 'industry' is the one that has the 'responsibility' to set limits or 'boundaries.' |
| Q4 | ix | Salespeople provide much-needed information and education to physicians. In many cases the glossy brochures, article reprints and prescriptions they deliver are primary sources of drug education for healthcare givers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that sales workers give doctors important facts and teaching. The papers and booklets they provide are the main way that doctors learn about how to use different medicines. Answer Explanation: The answer identifies that Paragraph D discusses the helpful or beneficial aspects of drug marketing and sales. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is 'ix' (The positive side of drugs promotion) because the paragraph focuses on the useful services that sales representatives provide. It mentions they offer 'much-needed information and education' and act as 'specialists' to help 'busy doctors' get facts quickly. This focuses on the advantages, or the 'positive side,' rather than the criticisms found in other parts of the text. |
| Q5 | i | 'I've been the recipient of golf balls from one company and I use them, but it doesn't make me prescribe their medicine,' says one doctor. 'I tend to think I'm not influenced by what they give me.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows a doctor explaining that while he accepts gifts like golf balls, he does not let these gifts control which drugs he chooses for his patients. Answer Explanation: The answer means that some medical doctors do not change their behavior or habits just because they receive free items from drug companies. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is heading 'i' because Paragraph E describes the many gifts drug companies give to doctors, such as pens, golf balls, and expensive meals. However, at the end of the paragraph, a doctor states that even though he receives these items, they do not make him prescribe that company's medicine. This shows that he is not 'persuaded' or influenced by these marketing tactics, which perfectly matches the meaning of the heading. |
| Q6 | vii | Though few comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe. A total of 131 doctors self-reported their prescribing patterns - the conclusion was that the availability of samples led them to dispense and prescribe drugs that differed from their preferred drug choice | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that a university did a study on how free medicine samples affect doctors. It found that having these samples made doctors choose medicines they did not normally prefer to use. Answer Explanation: The answer vii means that a formal study (research) shows that giving out free items and advertisements (promotion) is effective and changes what doctors do. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is vii because the paragraph describes a scientific study conducted by the University of Washington. This study (research) investigated if giving free medicine samples to doctors changed their behavior. The study found that these samples influenced doctors to give out different medicines than they usually would. This change in behavior is evidence that the marketing strategies (promotion) are working successfully. |
| Q7 | x | And patients are the ones who pay - in the form of sky-rocketing prescription prices - for every pen that's handed out, every free theatre ticket, and every steak dinner eaten | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that patients are the people who actually pay for the free gifts given to doctors because those costs make the price of medicine go up very high. Answer Explanation: The answer identifies that the person who eventually covers the cost of gifts given to doctors is the patient. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is heading x because Paragraph G explains that patients are the ones who suffer from high medicine prices to cover the costs of marketing. The text mentions that patients pay for the gifts, such as pens and dinners, because the prices of their prescriptions are very high. This directly answers the question 'Who really pays for doctors' free gifts?' |
| Q8 | NO | what Schaefer can offer is typical for today's drugs rep - a car trunk full of promotional gifts and gadgets, a budget that could buy lunches and dinners for a small country, hundreds of free drug samples and the freedom to give a physician $200 to prescribe her new product to the next six patients who fit the drug's profile | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Kim Schaefer has a very large amount of money to spend on things like gifts, free samples, and expensive meals. It describes her budget as being so big it could feed a whole country. Answer Explanation: The answer is NO because the statement is incorrect. Kim Schaefer actually has access to a very large amount of money for her work. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage describes the budget of sales representatives like Kim Schaefer as being extremely large rather than limited. The author uses the phrase 'a budget that could buy lunches and dinners for a small country' to emphasize how much money is available for promotional activities. This directly contradicts the idea that the budget is 'very limited'. The passage highlights that they have plenty of money for gifts, expensive meals, and even direct payments to doctors. |
| Q9 | YES | Selling pharmaceuticals is a daily exercise in ethical judgement. Salespeople like Schaefer walk the line between the common practice of buying a prospect's time with a free meal, and bribing doctors to prescribe their drugs | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that selling medicine involves making choices about what is right or wrong. It says Kim Schaefer's job is very close to giving bribes (giving money or gifts to make someone do something dishonest), which is why people might think her methods are not moral. Answer Explanation: The answer YES means that Kim Schaefer's way of selling medicine can be seen as wrong or unfair by some people. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author describes Kim Schaefer's job as a 'daily exercise in ethical judgement,' which means it involves constant decisions about what is right and wrong. The text explains that salespeople like her are often 'criticized' because their actions, such as giving expensive gifts or money to doctors, are very close to 'bribing.' This confirms that her marketing techniques can be questioned for moral reasons. |
| Q10 | NO | Salespeople provide much-needed information and education to physicians. In many cases the glossy brochures, article reprints and prescriptions they deliver are primary sources of drug education for healthcare givers | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that the information and teaching provided by drug representatives are very necessary for doctors. It highlights that the materials they provide are often the main way that medical professionals learn about medications. Answer Explanation: The answer NO means that the statement is false based on what the writer says in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NO because the passage explains that the information given by drug companies is actually very important and helpful for doctors. The author uses the term 'much-needed' to describe this information and notes that it serves as a 'primary source' (the main way) for doctors to learn about drugs. This directly contradicts the idea that the information is of 'little use'. |
| Q11 | YES | Rarely do patients watch a doctor write with a pen that isn't emblazoned with a drug's name, or see a nurse use a tablet not bearing a pharmaceutical company's logo | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that doctors almost always use pens with a medicine's name on them, and nurses usually use tablets that show a medicine company's symbol. Because patients see these things, the evidence of marketing is everywhere in the medical office. Answer Explanation: The answer means it is very easy for anyone to see signs of medicine advertisements when they are in a doctor's office or hospital. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the writer describes how common items used by medical staff are covered in company names or logos. Patients can easily see these items, such as pens and tablets, which makes the marketing very obvious. Key words like 'emblazoned' and 'logo' show that the branding is clearly printed on objects that people use every day. |
| Q12 | NOT GIVEN | Salespeople hand out hundreds of dollars' worth of samples each week - $7.2 billion worth of them in one year. Though few comprehensive studies have been conducted, one by the University of Washington investigated how drug sample availability affected what physicians prescribe | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that sales workers give many free drug samples to doctors every week and that these samples change what doctors decide to give to their patients. It does not mention drug companies ever giving samples to patients without a doctor being involved. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not provide any information regarding whether drug companies are allowed or choose to give free medicine samples directly to patients without a doctor's permission. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage discusses the distribution of free samples, it specifically mentions that sales representatives give these samples to doctors. The text explains how these samples influence what doctors prescribe to their patients, but it never mentions a scenario where companies bypass the doctor and give samples directly to patients. Because the author does not discuss this possibility, we cannot determine if the statement is true or false based on the text. |
| Q13 | YES | the fact remains that pharmaceutical companies have every right to make a profit | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says it is a true fact that these companies are allowed to make money from their business. Answer Explanation: The answer means it is okay and lawful for drug businesses to earn a profit. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the writer explicitly states that pharmaceutical businesses are entitled to make a profit. The word 'legitimate' in the question acts as a synonym for 'have every right' in the passage. Although the writer discusses the ethical issues and costs of their marketing, they acknowledge that the basic goal of making money is fair for any business. |
